What's your age range on.dating sites?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Male, 62. Age range 35-50

I’m 44 and wouldn’t date a 62 yo, no matter how rich, good looking and “young” you may be.

[Anonymous]

This response does not contain any objective data. For example, I am a 55 year old male, 6' 1", 190 llb, 6.5% body fat, resting heart rate is 55 beats per minute, VO2 max is 50.

This made me laugh. Who cares? Maybe it works while competing with other men, but women don't care about your "resting heart beat". This tedious information makes you sound older. Much older.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 35. I can't even think of a male celebrity age 62+ who turns me on. Yuck to that guy.

Denzel Washington. Jeff Goldblum. Patrick Stewart from 15 years ago.

It's a short list, admittedly.

All look super old and are! Rich and can buy youth. That's another thread..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male, 62. Age range 35-50

I’m 44 and wouldn’t date a 62 yo, no matter how rich, good looking and “young” you may be.

62 putting anything under 45 is just plain creepy. He's THAT guy everyone talks about on the dating sites...The Creeper.

[Anonymous]

This made me laugh. Who cares? Maybe it works while competing with other men, but women don't care about your "resting heart beat". This tedious information makes you sound older. Much older.

I supplied these examples to illustrate the difference between objective data (e.g., my resting heart rate is ___, I wear a DD cup) and subjective data (e.g., I have SUPER body.)

If you had read the PP’s post, most of it was about how she was a college athlete and in great shape. However, stating you are in “great shape” is subjective and most often meaningless when attempting to support a position. However, an example like “my VO2 max is __” is objective. It appears this point went far over your head.

Did you to college? If so, did you learn the fundamental difference between facts (which are objective points of data) and opinions (which are not)? It does not appear so and, sadly, I just wasted my time explaining this to someone who does not understand that there is a difference.

[Anonymous]

This tedious information makes you sound older. Much older.

Why are you implying that being older, or much older, is an insult? I am much older than a 40 year old poster.

But I am not too stupid under the difference between saying something is true is far from the same as proving it is true.

However, you are.

[Anonymous]

I'm 39 and my range is 28 to 44. I get mostly guys in their very early 30's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Male, 62. Age range 35-50

I’m 44 and wouldn’t date a 62 yo, no matter how rich, good looking and “young” you may be.

62 putting anything under 45 is just plain creepy. He's THAT guy everyone talks about on the dating sites...The Creeper.

The definition of "creepy" is not objective. "Creepy" is when an unattractive man dares to express sexual desire for women. If an attractive man does the same thing, it's not creepy. If this guy is actually dating women under 45, then obviously he is exceptionally attractive, not creepy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm 39 and my range is 28 to 44. I get mostly guys in their very early 30's.

They are looking for an easy pump and dump, not a wife.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 39 and my range is 28 to 44. I get mostly guys in their very early 30's.

They are looking for an easy pump and dump, not a wife.

Exactly. I had a friend who through her late 30s and early 40s kept dating younger men. She wanted to have a child. She never got a husband or a baby.

[Anonymous]

I was a collegiate athlete and have always been fit, as a high income 40 year old woman with the resources of time, history, genetics and drive...I SHOULD have a great body and I do. Wealth protects you from saggy boobs (the subtle boob job is great mileage) and Botox and a hint of fillers? No brainer.


She does not need to be on any dating site to get what she wants. All she needs is a mirror and a vibrator (or maybe just the mirror when she is really in the mood.)

[Anonymous]

I was a collegiate athlete and have always been fit, as a high income 40 year old woman with the resources of time, history, genetics and drive...I SHOULD have a great body and I do. Wealth protects you from saggy boobs (the subtle boob job is great mileage) and Botox and a hint of fillers? No brainer.

She does not need to be on any dating site to get what she wants. All she needs is a mirror and a vibrator (or maybe just the mirror when she is really in the mood.)

[Anonymous]

I am 43. My age range is 40 - 50.

I find that most guys in the late thirties to early forties range have ranges where their age is the top of the range. So the 40 year old guy is looking for 30-40ish.

I have put younger and gotten a few responses from men in their late 30s and I am fine with that too. Most of the responses I get are men 45-50 ish.

I won't reply to someone who doesn't include their age in their range. So if the 50 year old guy is looking for 35-45 he is out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This made me laugh. Who cares? Maybe it works while competing with other men, but women don't care about your "resting heart beat". This tedious information makes you sound older. Much older.

I supplied these examples to illustrate the difference between objective data (e.g., my resting heart rate is ___, I wear a DD cup) and subjective data (e.g., I have SUPER body.)

If you had read the PP’s post, most of it was about how she was a college athlete and in great shape. However, stating you are in “great shape” is subjective and most often meaningless when attempting to support a position. However, an example like “my VO2 max is __” is objective. It appears this point went far over your head.

Oh trust me, I didn't miss your fine tuned sample of 36" woman's waist - something that absolutely no woman would ever want to have (and you wouldn't like it either). This means that you actually have no idea how 36" waist looks like. "College educated", yet clueless about body proportions and visual concepts.

I yet have to meet a woman who claimed to be in great shape and she wasn't. And that's because most women are extremely self critical. If the lady says she has a nice body, she probably does.
We still don't know if she can compete with you as an athlete but that's objectively irrelevant. You should compete with other men instead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This tedious information makes you sound older. Much older.

Why are you implying that being older, or much older, is an insult? I am much older than a 40 year old poster.

But I am not too stupid under the difference between saying something is true is far from the same as proving it is true.

However, you are.

It's an insult only if you are a person who likes to bore others with his own health stats. This kind of obsessive monitoring of health is more typical for hypochondriacs or elderly in poor health. It's not attractive. And it's definitely not a sign of vivacious, youthful approach to life.