Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1) BK *lied* under oath about his drinking. Doesn't matter why, or what pressures were on him, or that the drinking took place when he was younger. A SCOTUS should *never* lie under oath. The truly sad part about this is that if he had not lied about his drinking (which we all would have chalked up to as typical highschool/college behavior), we would be more likely to believe him about the Ford assault claims.

2) BK was clearly partisan when it mattered. Before the SJC, televised before the nation, he made clearly biased claims about the Democratic Party and the Clintons.

1. No he didn’t.
2. No he wasn’t.

I think it is crazy that these insane allegations were thrown at him and you expect him to respond in a calm manner.
I also think it is telling that your arguments for not confirming him have moved throughout this confirmation. A sign that you are prepared to throw anything at him to derail the nomination.

Blaming the allegations on left wing organizations as revenge for the clintons isn't partisan?

Posts like this are why people think you are stupid

When Clinton’s former campaign aide is one of those leading the charge against your nomination, I would say there may be some truth to what he is saying.
Brian Fallon leads the group Demand Justice that has been out front in vocally opposing Kavanaugh.

One of the groups? Have you forgotten exactly how many groups there are?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford’s lawyers did her no favors refusing to supply her therapy notes, polygraph tests etc.

Yep. Makes us question what is REALLY in those pieces of evidence.

Why should they participate in a sham of an Concluded investigation where not one of there witnesses was interviewed? That partisan sleaze posing as a lawyer, aka Mike Davis, would just find a way to use them inappropriately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love all these people who think they know how “professionals” respond to false allegations of moral turpitude, when they have no practical experience seeing people so accused.

Reminds me of when people though Amanda Knox was a sex murdress because she did a cartwheel when dealing with the death of her roommate. “That’s not how you act” they chanted, never for a moment reflecting on the basis for their suppositions about how one is to respond to a different situation.

I don’t know what the truth is for Kavanaugh or Ford.

I do know that you cannot divine any great insight from his anger after being accused. In either direction.

Yes you can. He put Bill Clinton through similar or worst questions. Clinton did not lose his shit. This guy is a right wring nut job with anger control issues. He needs to be remove as a judge.

[Anonymous]

So... Kavanaugh deserved due process but HRC didn't.

Kavanaugh deserved due process, but even though the Central Park Five was exonerated as part of our due process, Trump still insists they are guilty.

Hm.. I see a pattern here.

[Anonymous]

NP. Really? Because my father was a judge for almost 30 years. He was a registered Democrat, nominated by a Lizard People in the 1980s! He was a man that was slow to anger, principled and decent. He made some unpopular decisions and was attacked mercilessly for it. In spite of his political differences with higher court judges like Scalia, he would have breakfast with him often and share jokes in the judicial cafeteria. Kavanaugh does not and cannot fit into this circle of men and women of conscience and decorum. He is a sneering rogue--an embarrassment to decent people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford’s lawyers did her no favors refusing to supply her therapy notes, polygraph tests etc.

Yep. Makes us question what is REALLY in those pieces of evidence.

Keep digging, boys. Ford is almost beside the point by now, Kavanaugh has given us so much evidence of his unfitness through his conduct in these proceedings that you no longer need to even get to Ford’s allegations to know he’s unqualified for the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

I suspect not. +1000

Hillary was accused of facilitating a child molesting ring at Comet Pizza. I've never seen her blow up over those accusations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ford’s lawyers did her no favors refusing to supply her therapy notes, polygraph tests etc.

Nah. It doesn't matter what's in those notes, whether it's corroborates her or not. It won't change anyone's mind.

She said her piece, that's it.

[Anonymous]

Wooops my auto correct typed Lizard People LOL--I meant Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Reports are that Monica McLean has been urging at least one witness to change her account.....

A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured to clarify her original statement regarding an alleged sexual assault involving Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

Ford identified Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate, as having attended a house party Maryland in the early 1980s, in which she accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream.

Keyser originally said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 23 she “does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present.” After Kavanaugh and Ford testified in front of the committee last week, Keyser wrote a letter to the committee dated Sept. 29 that said she did not refute Ford’s claims, but “is unable to corroborate it because she has no recollection of the incident in question," according to CNN.

Keyser told the investigators that she was -- as the Journal notes -- urged to clarify her statement by Monica McLean, a former FBI agent and friend of Ford’s, the paper reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/friend-of-christine-blasey-ford-reportedly-felt-pressure-to-revisit-statement-on-allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

I suspect not. +1000

Hillary was accused of facilitating a child molesting ring at Comet Pizza. I've never seen her blow up over those accusations.

And of murderimg Vince Foster, by Brett Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wooops my auto correct typed Lizard People LOL--I meant Republicans.

That was hilariously awesome, I may have sprayed some coffee on my iPad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ford’s lawyers did her no favors refusing to supply her therapy notes, polygraph tests etc.

She agreed to supply those to the FBI, not the Senate, which is selectively leaking information. FBI chose not to accept her offer.

[Anonymous]

"Hillary was accused of facilitating a child molesting ring at Comet Pizza. I've never seen her blow up over those accusations."

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reports are that Monica McLean has been urging at least one witness to change her account.....

A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured to clarify her original statement regarding an alleged sexual assault involving Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

Ford identified Leland Ingham Keyser, a former classmate, as having attended a house party Maryland in the early 1980s, in which she accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream.

Keyser originally said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 23 she “does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present.” After Kavanaugh and Ford testified in front of the committee last week, Keyser wrote a letter to the committee dated Sept. 29 that said she did not refute Ford’s claims, but “is unable to corroborate it because she has no recollection of the incident in question," according to CNN.

Keyser told the investigators that she was -- as the Journal notes -- urged to clarify her statement by Monica McLean, a former FBI agent and friend of Ford’s, the paper reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/friend-of-christine-blasey-ford-reportedly-felt-pressure-to-revisit-statement-on-allegations

Wow. This is case-closed. Time to confirm Kavanaugh! Ford can request a two-doored jail cell.