Megyn Kelly, what are you doing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is how Republicans like to distract. Megan had the b*++%s to ask Putin direct questions about his role in the US elections! Way to go Megyn! And way to denigrate her OP, for something silly like dress sense!

Megyn chose to wear distracting party attire during a serious interview. She looked unprofessional and stupid when she was asking those serious and direct questions.

If Putin had shown up in his swimsuit, he would have looked stupid and undignified. See how that works?

NO, you are very naive. This is not how it works. The different rules apply to men and women. Women loves with their ears, so they don't care much how the men dressed. Men love with their eyes, so how the woman is dressed is very important.

different rules apply in different situations. in many situations very similar rules apply to men and women. she is doing a political interview, not speed dating at a bar.

Well, she is not playing by the rules, that is why she is where she is.

no, that's not why she is where she is. to the contrary, when she played by the rules, such as they were, she was climbing. now she is more in a stall.

But she is in a stall (as you call it) because this is where she wants to be. She perfectly knows the rules, and she knows how to play by the rules. This is how she climbed up. Now she is at the point of her life where she wants to do what she wants to do.

umm no. she was pushed out of fox where she was miserable because everyone hated her and is now in a big career limbo with few places to go to if this doesn't work out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean she was attending a state dinner with an interview on the side, right? She should maybe have erred on toward what looks best for the interview instead of the dinner, but otherwise a gown is normal for women. She could have gone either/or on slit or décolletage but isn't this just the nature of women's formal wear?

this gown is not normal for a mid forties woman attending a state dinner (as opoosed to justin bieber party).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean she was attending a state dinner with an interview on the side, right? She should maybe have erred on toward what looks best for the interview instead of the dinner, but otherwise a gown is normal for women. She could have gone either/or on slit or décolletage but isn't this just the nature of women's formal wear?

this gown is not normal for a mid forties woman attending a state dinner (as opoosed to justin bieber party).

Oh, honey Your "normal" is not everyone's normal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean she was attending a state dinner with an interview on the side, right? She should maybe have erred on toward what looks best for the interview instead of the dinner, but otherwise a gown is normal for women. She could have gone either/or on slit or décolletage but isn't this just the nature of women's formal wear?

this gown is not normal for a mid forties woman attending a state dinner (as opoosed to justin bieber party).

Oh, honey Your "normal" is not everyone's normal.

that's clear enough. however overwhelming majority of people think this dress was inappropriate. that's good enough for me.

[Anonymous]

She looks beautiful!

[Anonymous]

She is a blatant, unrepentant racist so it does not surprise me that her bad judgment seeps into her wardrobe choices as well.

I do not understand how our society could reward someone like her with millions of dollars and a mainstream television program. But I guess sex sells and telling people what they want to hear sells, especially if you're telling them that black people are a bunch of entitled hoodlums, and that's what really matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She knows what it takes to get the attention of men like Trump and Putin.

This. Strategy. She's not my favorite but she's no dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The dress is... not good, but the shoes are what really pushed things over the top.

[Anonymous]

umm no. she was pushed out of fox where she was miserable because everyone hated her and is now in a big career limbo with few places to go to if this doesn't work out.

Pushed out of Fox? Is that what Fox's offer to raise her salary from $15 million to $20 million looks like to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the big deal?

the big deal is that she dressed like a prostitute to interview putin. why do that?

Newsflash: this is not the interview it's from a party. NBC has a teaser and she's wearing a black high neck dress (or top) with sleeves for the sit down. There's also a panel discussion where she's wearing white pants and a structured top. And she got her interview, she's professional, he's condescending and snarky, it won't play well.

[Anonymous]

Women on fox news are always dressed like they are headed to a night club. Thats the way roger liked it. Whats the problem?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

umm no. she was pushed out of fox where she was miserable because everyone hated her and is now in a big career limbo with few places to go to if this doesn't work out.

Pushed out of Fox? Is that what Fox's offer to raise her salary from $15 million to $20 million looks like to you?

The management liked her but coworkers hated her. She was miserable and hated going to work. So yes she was pushed out by popular demand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The dress is... not good, but the shoes are what really pushed things over the top.

are we seeing her bra or what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women on fox news are always dressed like they are headed to a night club. Thats the way roger liked it. Whats the problem?

1) not to this extent at least not regularly
2) they are not talking to heads of state

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She needs to "figure it out" and go with one image if she wants to be taken seriously. This is date night attire, hopefully she is smart enough to know this. The NBC execs are parading her around like a circus act, she is supposed to be their golden child, but she is NO Diane Sawyer and she never will be.

+1 I agree but think a lot of women today say one thing and dress another. They say they want to be taken seriously and not viewed as sex objects, yet they dress as she did for that interview. Not saying you have to be in Puritan garb, but what she wore is not a professional look. She and others need to admit what they're doing. They're trying to look sexy.