Can we talk about how Emma Watson cannot act?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is the British Kristen Stewart

but K Stew is actually gorgeous. Emma is bland.

They can both be pretty but they are also both one-note actors. Emma does reserved wonderment and Kristen does reserved disgruntlement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Emma is an MK Ultra Beta Sex Kitten used and abused from birth. Acting is what pays the bills. Her real role is being passed around to the elite.

I feel sorry for her. She has no idea what she's doing. Rumor has it she's actually a boy and her new boyfriend is her handler.

If you look closely at her pictures over the years, her blank expression speaks for itself. And that black see through Dior dress she wore with Baphomet on her vaginal area confirms what she is. Sad. She is not the only one either.

Evil people own her.

MK ultra beta sex kitten?!?!
What does that even mean?

[Anonymous]

She sails by because she’s preachy in her femimism and is the “right kind” of navel gazer for the Hollywood crowd.

[Anonymous]

She was fine in bling ring and wallflower. Nothing amazing. She’s good looking. She seems like a nice person.

Find something better to do, all of you.

[Anonymous]

It was unfortunate she was cast as Belle in the live action movie. She can't sing at all.

[Anonymous]

She is a child actress who knows nothing except acting. I agree she never really grew into the craft. Kids are kind of allowed to be bad actors but after a decade or more of acting, and maybe when you start so young you don't take lessons or get much constructive feedback or really grow...unless you are self aware and self motivated to do so. People who work their way up to acting through years of plays and small features have a lot more experience and have had a lot of feedback and learning along the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Emma is an MK Ultra Beta Sex Kitten used and abused from birth. Acting is what pays the bills. Her real role is being passed around to the elite.

I feel sorry for her. She has no idea what she's doing. Rumor has it she's actually a boy and her new boyfriend is her handler.

If you look closely at her pictures over the years, her blank expression speaks for itself. And that black see through Dior dress she wore with Baphomet on her vaginal area confirms what she is. Sad. She is not the only one either.

Evil people own her.

I’m sorry, what now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was unfortunate she was cast as Belle in the live action movie. She can't sing at all.

Yes.

That was tragic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://variety.com/2018/film/news/emma-watson-emma-stone-little-women-1202911028/

How does this girl still get cast in movies?

Is she going to ruin remakes of every childhood movie I loved with her eyebrow-acting?

Wait...what...woah!

No, just no.

Emma Watson as Jo?!? Ugh!

Why are they remaking it? The one with Winona Rider was just about perfect. There is no reason to remake Little Women again, particularly not with this cast.

And if they are remaking it, they should be American actresses, not a bunch of Brits and Irish actresses.

[Anonymous]

Just googled again.

Emma Watson as Meg??? That is even worse than Emma Watson as Jo.

Did the casting people and director even read the book?

[Anonymous]

What a miscast bunch of actresses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just googled again.

Emma Watson as Meg??? That is even worse than Emma Watson as Jo.

Did the casting people and director even read the book?

Meg I could see. Jo I could not.

Winona Ryder was horribly miscast as jo. She is way too waifish. She should have been Beth and the strappingly hearty Clare Danes should have been jo.

The pbs remake was great. We don't need another version.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel the same way about Natalie Portman. I feel like the world is playing a big joke on me, a la the Emperor's New Clothes. She cannot act at all and has zero charisma - but she has a beautiful face.

YES!!!!! I completely agree with you yet when I have expressed this opinion to people I get pushback. She is lovely but she cannot act!!! And I also agree with posters who say that Emma Watson can't act either.

I agree. And I have a similar feeling about Keira Knightly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emma is an MK Ultra Beta Sex Kitten used and abused from birth. Acting is what pays the bills. Her real role is being passed around to the elite.

I feel sorry for her. She has no idea what she's doing. Rumor has it she's actually a boy and her new boyfriend is her handler.

If you look closely at her pictures over the years, her blank expression speaks for itself. And that black see through Dior dress she wore with Baphomet on her vaginal area confirms what she is. Sad. She is not the only one either.

Evil people own her.

I’m sorry, what now?

Whoa. Come back, conspiracy theory PP, and tell all!
(MK Ultra was a 1950s-60s secret government program attempting mind control via drugs etc. There have been congressional investigations of it. You can guess just how successful it was.... Until now! Who knew?!)

[Anonymous]

So glad others feel the same as I do about her acting. It’s over done, stilted and unreal.