Under Armour Shares Falling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of successful proffered Nike patrons in DC. I don't know why previous posters are so ignorant as to assume the top-selling athletic footwear brand is unpopular. Be careful not to share your negative feelings and biases about Nike with your colleagues or your boss, as you may end up looking down one casual Friday and see what they're wearing and end up putting your precious Under Armored foot in your mouth.

Not from OP. I own my posts, but this isn't one of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/17874079/stephen-curry-armour-pressure-season

Lots of interesting perspectives on UA in the comments section of the ESPN article linked above. Including one comment from a poster who just doesn't like their logo. I agree that the UA logo is underwhelming.

Great article by ESPN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kids don't wear Nike anymore.[i]

You can actually get made fun of.

Yes, today's kids and their style setters definitely don't wear Nike anymore.

Oh to be young and beautiful, wealthy and famous, and of course wearing a fly pair of Nikes.

[Anonymous]

He's literally building a new city in Baltimore. Google Port Covington (I think that's what he's calling it). He also purchased the water taxi industry. I'm not worried about his pocketbook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kids don't wear Nike anymore.[i]

You can actually get made fun of.

Yes, today's kids and their style setters definitely don't wear Nike anymore.

You must live under a rock, so I'll help you. Kendall 21 and Taylor 27 are not kids. And when we talk Under Armor wear, we're mostly referring to cloths as opposed to shoes. While Nike may still dominate in footwear. Under Armor is king in clothing. That's why it is fact to say that kids--- preteens and teens, don't wear Nike anymore. You can actually be made fun. And quite frankly Nike was never as popular with kids as Under Armor has become. BTW Taylor Swift is actually 27. Not a kid by any standard.

[Anonymous]

+1 to PP above (I don't want to link all the pictures). The boys I see wear Nike or Adaidas shoes and UA clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:+1 to PP above (I don't want to link all the pictures). The boys I see wear Nike or Adaidas shoes and UA clothes.

+ 1

Because UA shoes are uncomfortable, nobody wears them. But all boys wear UA shirts, shorts, pants and hoodies. Their sports gear/equipment is popular as well. Cleats, lax gear, footballs, basketballs, mitts, backpacks, etc.

[Anonymous]

http://buildportcovington.com

Info on the new waterfront neighborhood he's building.

[Anonymous]

You are correct. Kendall (21), Gigi (21), Taylor (27), and young women like them are not "kids", but they certainly do influence tween and teen styles.

Here are other style setters who influence kids' tastes, wearing Nike apparel and it is not limited to shoes.





[/img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mVBMYzqO1HM/VFdgxKtVdOI/AAAAAAAAGh4/utjr1xNKm9c/s1600/rosie%2Bhuntington%2Bwhiteley%2Bin%2Bblue%2Bcapri%2Bleggings%2Bblack%2Bnike%2Bhoodie%2Bwith%2Bpink%2Bnike%2Bsneakers%2Band%2Bblack%2Bstudded%2Bbag%2Bworking%2Bout%2Bnovember%2B1%2B2014%2Bwest%2Bhollywood.jpg[img]

[/img]http://www.denimblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Harry-Styles-Paige-Lennox-Ace-e1417549568349.jpg[img]

[/img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-q36Ow2OuCuQ/T-ivkH5GfrI/AAAAAAADAvY/XW4lqX0wN1I/s600/news_earned-not-given-tshirt-2.jpg[img]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Her hoodie is Nike too.

[Anonymous]

Does someone here work for Nike? No one needs to stan for either of these multi-billion dollar companies. Find something better to do with your time instead of sweating Taylor basic Swift

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kids don't wear Nike anymore.[i]

You can actually get made fun of.

Yes, today's kids and their style setters definitely don't wear Nike anymore.

You must live under a rock, so I'll help you. Kendall 21 and Taylor 27 are not kids. And when we talk Under Armor wear, we're mostly referring to cloths as opposed to shoes. While Nike may still dominate in footwear. Under Armor is king in clothing.[i] That's why it is fact to say that kids--- preteens and teens, don't wear Nike anymore. You can actually be made fun. And quite frankly Nike was never as popular with kids as Under Armor has become. BTW Taylor Swift is actually 27. Not a kid by any standard.

You must live under a rock, so let me help you by making the point one last time. The young and not-so-young adults who influence tween and teen styles and tastes, can often be spotted wearing Nike apparel -- and not just the shoes bro. I'm just saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does someone here work for Nike? No one needs to stan for either of these multi-billion dollar companies. Find something better to do with your time instead of sweating Taylor basic Swift

This. The Nike poster has got some serious issues.

[Anonymous]

Cool story, bro.