lady at the buffet has an ebt card and Iphone

Anonymous
Even working full time $12 an hour job will get a single mom EBT. Lots of folks on EBT work hard full time jobs.
In some states low income families can have free or $10 a month Internet. And a free computer for school age children to do homework.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I went to Golden Corral last night. This lady had an Virginia EBT Card, she also had IPHONE. This is what wrong with America. This is What Mr. Trump will fix if his elected president. Why does she have an Iphone? Why is she eating out when she has food stamps?


"This is What Mr. Trump will fix . . . " How?

I confess a lack of familiarity, but what does golden corral cost? $9.99?

"Why does she have an Iphone?" Haven't you heard, OP? Obama makes sure everyone has a free phone!
Anonymous
OP ..... Did you go to the hair salon before the GC?

http://youtu.be/POk-uOQSJVk
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's always better to mind your own business OP , You probably get tax breaks that that person doesn't get such as mortgage deductions or other deductions that poor people can't take advantage of. Try to see the good in others and not the bad. Your life will be much happier ... I guarantee it.


Your post makes sense except for the "tax break" comment. Poor people generally do not pay income tax, so no tax breaks needed.


Point is, people who get mortgage deductions are being subsidized. And what about the carried interest loophole, subsidy for billionaires?


Not quite. Mortgage interest deductions reduce how much of one's own income one must turn over to the government. Those deductions are a hand out like food stamps only if you consider one's own income to really be the government's money in the first place.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's always better to mind your own business OP , You probably get tax breaks that that person doesn't get such as mortgage deductions or other deductions that poor people can't take advantage of. Try to see the good in others and not the bad. Your life will be much happier ... I guarantee it.


Your post makes sense except for the "tax break" comment. Poor people generally do not pay income tax, so no tax breaks needed.


That's . . . exactly what the PP said?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I went to Golden Corral last night. This lady had an Virginia EBT Card, she also had IPHONE. This is what wrong with America. This is What Mr. Trump will fix if his elected president. Why does she have an Iphone? Why is she eating out when she has food stamps?


How did you know what card of card she had? How close were you? All cards look alike.
Anonymous
Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe her employer gave her the Iphone?


yeah

as though THAT will happen
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.


I am not on public assistance and I shop at Sears and Penney's. no shame in that
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's always better to mind your own business OP , You probably get tax breaks that that person doesn't get such as mortgage deductions or other deductions that poor people can't take advantage of. Try to see the good in others and not the bad. Your life will be much happier ... I guarantee it.


Your post makes sense except for the "tax break" comment. Poor people generally do not pay income tax, so no tax breaks needed.


That's . . . exactly what the PP said?


So people who aren't poor should feel fortunate that the government doesn't take ALL of their money?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.


I think this is what so many people are upset about. So many of us had lean years without assistance and it's hard to see people getting assistance and still not using it to their full advantage.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.


I am not on public assistance and I shop at Sears and Penney's. no shame in that

Me too. Sears is the best. Many people don't buy those designer looking clothes/hats/purses...we make them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.


I am not on public assistance and I shop at Sears and Penney's. no shame in that

Me too. Sears is the best. Many people don't buy those designer looking clothes/hats/purses...we make them.


No shame at all. I shop at WalMart and I live in McLean. I hate wasting money.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.


I think this is what so many people are upset about. So many of us had lean years without assistance and it's hard to see people getting assistance and still not using it to their full advantage.


You have to be in extremely dire circumstances to qualify for EBT. There's no way you can comprehend that level of poverty.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Many people on welfare and other public assistance programs live better than a young college graduate, working an entry-leve professional job. When I was in my 20s - before Internet and cell phones - I remember comparing phone plans carefully before deciding I would buy the LIMITED phone plan rather than unlimited, saving 30% off my bill. It was what I could afford at the time.

In the meantime, I rented an apartment in a dumpy building where I was afraid to come home after 10 pm. At the same time, a 19-year-old with a baby was living in a government-subsidized 3-bedroom apartment for $87 a month, and renting out the other two bedrooms for cash, under the table. She had money to spare, and was always dressed in nice clothes and fancy hats. (Yes, I remember the hats in particular. People didn't even wear them and she had one for every day of the week!) In the meantime, I did all my shopping at JCPenney and Sears. Something is very wrong when a teenager living on government assistance programs has a higher lifestyle than a college graduate in her 20s.


I think this is what so many people are upset about. So many of us had lean years without assistance and it's hard to see people getting assistance and still not using it to their full advantage.


You have to be in extremely dire circumstances to qualify for EBT. There's no way you can comprehend that level of poverty.


The bolded, exactly. I love how all of these 'examples' start. 'Many people' turns into 'one person that I observed sometime 20 years ago'. That's not 'many people' PP, and I strongly suggest that you do some actual research into people who are actually surviving on benefits, and how 'glamorous' it is.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: