Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It seems like any of these schools could probably create and fill a single 6/7/8th grade classroom if they chose to. It's not like you need THAT much special infrastructure for 30 kids. You'd lose the benefits of having larger/multiple classes, but you could still do it.
I don't know if this is what the original poster was referring to when discussing SSMA's "plans," but if you look at the floor plans attached to their charter amendment application, the top floor of their new buildings had classrooms that appeared to be tentatively slated for the middle school age group.
There can't be all that many of us ssma parents with upper elementary children , but let me say that I assume ssma is working hard on a middle school (and I hope that's true, because all I've heard are rumors to that effect--fairly solid ones, but rumors all the same) because we will have kids who will need a middle school. Soon! Sooner than Lee, and much, much sooner than breakthrough .
Again, although I still am amused by my own thunderdome idea, this is not a competition. This is not a race. This is just an effort for some of us to stay at a school we love where our kids are thriving. Should ssma combine it's middle school with Lee and breakthrough later? Sure. If it makes sense. But it's a little early to making all of these hypothetical assumptions about anything.