I hope you do realize you are part of the problem in perpetuating the gender pay gap. Let's focus on paying what the job is worth https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2016/04/29/how-the-whats-your-current-salary-question-hurts-the-gender-pay-gap/ |
That's a load of crap. Tell me what you are offering and allow me to be the adult and decide whether I will be happy. They do not care about happiness. When they are asking this upfront, they are getting salary information for a lot of people - not just the one they are hiring. This is highly valuable information on what each of their competitors is paying. It also gives tremendous bargaining power when making an offer. |
I agree. The PP's rationale for asking for current salary is outrageous. There are myriad reasons why someone might not have significant salary progression or promotions or is underpaid. You tell the applicant how much you're willing to pay (a range), and the applicant can decide whether or not the salary works for her or him. |
Do you actually interview for roles without asking for the range upfront?! |
Just another reason why you don't tell them how much you make. |
I've never had a potential employer disqualify me for not disclosing my salary. It's really not that difficult. |
We simply don't tell them upfront how much your making. Nothing puts you behind the eight ball in negotiating and limits your potential salary gain like voluntarily telling them what your current salary is. It is that simple. |
This "corporate recruiter" like to pollute the salary negotiating threads with her bullying about bullshit like "interview 101." You NEVER, EVER tell a potential employer what you are making. PERIOD. |
|
Having gone through this process as both and employee and a manager, I try and avoid corporate recruiters at all costs, because they will do everything in their power to fuck up the process.
I wrote my PhD dissertation in hiring contracts and understand that contracts are a multidimensional negotiation, of which salary is only one component. Anyone who focuses on salary is fundamentally incapable of doing their job since they don't understand the many issues of hiring. For example, at the beginning of my career, I took a below-market-salary job at the federal government because I knew that they would give me access to proprietary data and pay for a lot of programming training in SAS, C++, and SQL. I then leveraged that into talking to several other private companies (where I'd met the recruiters at conventions) that paid me three times as much. If they had ever asked me what I had previously made at the Fed, we would have both known that they were full of shit and not serious about the job. The point is that, in any negotiation, salary is only one component. I regularly consult for doctors on stats projects for free because I want them to get the best possible stats advice on medical cures. I regularly chars companies $600/hr for advice on how to run "data analytices" on their databases. Giving a salary is meaningless and totally uninformative from my perspective, but I know that unimaginative corporate recruiters demand it. I usually just list my highest number to not jump ship. If they can't meet that, then there's no point, and you're under no legal obligation to list your actual salary. |