So what? I'm sure there are National Merit Finalists who either don't believe in a god or believe in one that different and directly opposed to yours. People who are otherwise intelligent can still hold objectively incorrect beliefs for a variety of reason. People who are otherwise not that smart can still hold objectively correct beliefs for a variety of reasons. Intelligence is a good bellwether of the validity of beliefs but it's not perfect. |
So, in other words, you came back to same ideas that were presented to you as "true" from an early age. I also don't see how you can go from "how could the Big Bang cause itself?" to Jesus is definitely the son of the one true god, YHWH. That's a big leap in logic. Also, isn't William Lane Craig a young earth creationist? Pretty sure he's not exactly who want to endorse if you're trying to bring people back to your faith. |
I do -- I go to Hindu temples every now and then. I will also wander into a Christian church to quietly contemplate or pray, and I have gone by invitation by a friend to service on several occasions. To make things more confusing, my husband is Jewish, but his family does not practice a lot. I'd like to experience more. I've been to Jewish services and seders a few times. I wish there were more of a Hindu spiritual community here -- or maybe a Unitarian church. I know, I'm all over the place. But what I really like is the meditation and fellowship. Hinduism seems to lack the latter. |
Another big question is why, after causing the big bang, did god wait billions of years to create humans and then many more years to send his son to redeem them? Other questions: Why did humans need redemption? Why did God only reveal this to a small group of humans in the middle east? Why has it taken so long for this important information to spread and why don't more people accept it? Why do even people who do accept it (Christians) differ so much with each other that they have wars with each other or break off into different denominations? |
You are trying to use reason against an unreasonable premise. Religion persists because you are not supposed to be reasonable with it. Using reason to argue against religion is like using science to argue against astrology. The other side won't be convinced and you will only be frustrated in the process. When someone makes a dubious claim without foundation in the facts, just dismiss it and move on. There is no point in arguing against it. |
That's true but hopefully someone else will come along, read this conversation, and start connecting the dots for themselves. I think the benefit here is to get other people (not the OP) thinking critically about how they approach "faith" and start asking questions |
|
I grew up agnostic and came from agnostic parents. The only bit of religion came from my Anglican grandmother who took me to church twice when I was 8. Fast forward to my thirties, when I underwent major surgery. In the intensive care unit, I had a flatlined and saw the white light. And floated up to it. It was calling me and was so peaceful. My pain instantly left. Someone (God?) told me I had more work to do and to come back later. I'm back at the hospital, with intense pain, it's loud and doctors and nurses are frantically working on me.
I'm a believer now. In what or whom, I'm not sure exactly. But now I believe in God and heaven. I quit my corporate attorney job and am now working with troubled young people as a counselor. I felt a calling to give back. My life is so much better now. |
I'm glad that experience had a positive effect on your life. Perhaps you've heard that the "white light" experience is not uncommon and of course is not proof of God and heaven any more than a dream about seeing flames and hearing a ghoulish voice would be proof of the devil and hell. More likely, its your brain responding in ways that we don't yet understand. |