Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Makes you wonder why ATS still exists. If it's as good, not so much better, then neighborhood schools, why not make it a neighborhood school? Preschool for #2 and McK are so far apart. 3 miles. Not looking forward to evening commute at all. No alternative is ideal.
Because the true believers are a vehement bunch. Maybe when the principal retires, it will change back to a neighborhood school? There's no budging it otherwise.
It has really good SOL scores and pulls from all over the county.
They should go the other way--replicate the model in more schools.
Its been a countywide school forever so its not like anyone bought there thinking they could walk to a neighborhood school….not sure how this is any different from someone who lives 2 miles from the nearest elementary saying "they should build a school down the street so my kids can walk!" No, you should have bought a house in the walk zone for a neighborhood school if it was that important to you.
No, just no. Plenty of us choose not to apply to ATS because we don't think the learning style would work for our kids. I don't want my child pushed into something that would be a disaster for him.
And plenty of people live in areas where a very high proportion of kids are low-income, don't speak English at home, or live in short-term rentals and move in and out all the time. Shouldn't some of those kids get the opportunity to go to a stable school? If there's such a big wait list for ATS, seems like the demand is there for another choice program.
You really think this is the reason for the long waitlist at ATS? People in unstable living situations are not going to be the ones seeking out choice schools for the most part. They're understandably more focused on their day-to-day survival than on going to a bunch of information sessions (largely conducted in a language they may not speak) to apply.
I'm also not sure why you think that ATS would provide better ESOL services than the neighborhood schools. Do you have information to back that up?
No, I'm saying it would be good if there were more choices for people who want them (especially if Arlington housing policy is going to continue to concentrate low-income housing in a few small areas), and ATS has been shown to be a good model for the kids who have attended, and it has a huge wait list.
Good model for those who attend, which is a self-selecting group. That doesn't mean it's the right model for everyone. I mean, I assume that when you applied you looked at the programming at your neighborhood school and that of ATS, and made a decision based on your child and how your child learns about which environment would be best. And didn't just go by the test scores, right?