Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is the OP. Guess we were frugal about our wedding (only 75 guests) but willing to spend money in real estate if it means a long term investment with a good return. Glad to hear that a $1.2 M house is doable but helpful to be reminded that it would be very dependent on our two incomes remaining the same or higher.
A 10k wedding must have blown.
My parents spent around 100 for the same amount of guests.
Bless your heart, dearie, this isn't something to brag about.
Wasn't bragging. Was just saying 10k seems low. I don't know anyone who spent less than 100 on a wedding.
The OP is wise... You, on the other hand sound like a real dumb ass and a spoiled shit..
NP here. One of the least fun weddings I have ever been to was clearly a six figure wedding (with like 300 people) that was stuffy and pretentious. The food was amazing, but there was a classical orchestra and no one danced.
On the other hand, some of the most fun weddings I have been to have been low budget backyard BBQ style weddings. I think what makes a wedding fun is the couple and being able to have fun with close friends as opposed to every business associate of the couple. DH and I had about a 30k wedding, which still seems like a lot of money to me, and it was so much fun. The dance floor was packed all night! The pp bragging about the 100k wedding sounds boring and lame.