Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?
How bad is your uncorrected vision?
I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.