Wife Assaulted Me

[Anonymous]

Your wife is nuts. Good thing you are seeing a lawyer. Keep some cash at a friend's house or something. Scan your important documents in case she decides to shred them. Also like the suggestion about keeping a pair of glasses elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

Continuity is the least of your problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.

+1000

Me,too.I could get to the car and grab a large item like a purse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

How bad is your uncorrected vision? I can't even see the alarm clock a foot from my head if I don't have glasses on, but I could find a car outside. This sounds completely plausible to me.

+1000

Me,too.I could get to the car and grab a large item like a purse.

Yes, me too. I have 20/500 vision w/o my glasses. I could grab a purse out of a car, but I sure as hell couldn't drive anywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

Continuity is the least of your problems.

The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

Continuity is the least of your problems.

The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.

You clearly have never been in an abusive relationship. Good. I am genuinely happy for you. However, those of us not so fortunate realize that for an abuser, anything is provocation: waking up 2 minute early, waking up 2 minutes late, preparing a favorite meal, forgetting a favorite meal, putting a bra in the dryer, not putting a bra in the dryer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

Continuity is the least of your problems.

The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.

You clearly have never been in an abusive relationship. Good. I am genuinely happy for you. However, those of us not so fortunate realize that for an abuser, anything is provocation: waking up 2 minute early, waking up 2 minutes late, preparing a favorite meal, forgetting a favorite meal, putting a bra in the dryer, not putting a bra in the dryer.

I've been there. Nothing is EVER good enough. It is constant walking on eggshells.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a continuity problem. OP says he was sightless, but was able to run out to her car, grab her purse to get his glasses back, and lock her out of the house. He's obviously not that blind since he could run around outside. How do you allege unlawful imprisonment if he wasn't imprisoned?

Continuity is the least of your problems.

The others being what? Sorry, but people going nuts with zero provocation is not that likely, so I think we are getting OPs sanitized version.

You clearly have never been in an abusive relationship. Good. I am genuinely happy for you. However, those of us not so fortunate realize that for an abuser, anything is provocation: waking up 2 minute early, waking up 2 minutes late, preparing a favorite meal, forgetting a favorite meal, putting a bra in the dryer, not putting a bra in the dryer.

No, I have been in one which was constant verbal abuse. It takes a lot to resist kicking someone in the nuts when that happens.

[Anonymous]

So OP still won't say why all of this happened?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So OP still won't say why all of this happened?

Doesn't matter. He asked for help on getting out of the relationship. All anyone needs to know. The details are for the police, DA, and a judge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So OP still won't say why all of this happened?

Doesn't matter. He asked for help on getting out of the relationship. All anyone needs to know. The details are for the police, DA, and a judge.

Totally agree!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, it matters what he did before if he hit her before. Otherwise, not really. Is he hurt? I suspect not. Especially if he thinks taking his keys/phone/glasses is the worst part of it.

Aren't you a piece of work. He's a guy so he must have done something to provoke the attack. Maybe he's not thinking 100% clearly so yeah.. there must be something more to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So OP still won't say why all of this happened?

Why does it matter what he did do provoke DW's violent outburst and assault? PPs, I would love to hear what you thnk would justify an assault by one partner on another. You want to know what wold justify it? Nothing! Even if OP cheated on DW, that would not justify he's she did. I hope he called the police.