I think Christie is finished

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is 2014. The election is in 2016. I will watch and wait.

Snort. What a profile in courage you are.

[Anonymous]

The difference is Hillary has endured scandals and there's momentum growing behind her. Her popularity is soaring in the Democratic Party and the economy is on an up-swing. Obama will pass off a healthy economy and his endorsement. Christie comes off as a vindicative loud mouth and this scandal isn't getting better. My guess is there's a smoking gun somewhere where he ordered the closures and there are tons of reporters digging to find it. It'll come out soon.

[Anonymous]

Snort. What a profile in courage you are.

We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.

[Anonymous]

Call Jeb Bush.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's kind of a shame. I thought he was the one Republican reasonable enough to deal with. Now he's one track suit short of Tony Soprano.

This is hilarious!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Snort. What a profile in courage you are.

We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.

No, PP is one of those totally transparent chicks who thinks she looks cool by being negative, while in reality she's too dumb to articulate which candidate she supports and why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Snort. What a profile in courage you are.

We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.

No, PP is one of those totally transparent chicks who thinks she looks cool by being negative, while in reality she's too dumb to articulate which candidate she supports and why.

What exactly is smart about picking your choice two years ahead, before anyone has even declared?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Snort. What a profile in courage you are.

We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.

+1 could not agree with you more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Snort. What a profile in courage you are.




We'd be a lot better off right now if people had watched and listened rather than jumped on the bandwagon for a candidate who was clearly not ready for prime time.


+1 could not agree with you more.

Yep bush caused a lot of problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I don't see that this is too bad for him. He retains plausible deniability...


He isn't going to have plausible deniability for long. There are already four different members of his staff involved.


And how many of Obama's staff were involved with the Benghazi cover up using the fake story of a video causing the attack?



zzzzzzzzzzz...... coverup of what. Has everyone agreed that the administration did not provide adequate security, and that it cost the lives of four of our own? Yes.


Assume Christie caused a traffic jam, and then did some other political dirty tricks in Hoboken. Assume he did what MSNBC says.

The premise of this thread is that those scandals sink him as a candidate in 2016.

Are those scandals worse than Benghazi, where you just said "everyone agree(s) the administration did not provide adequate security..."? Is Hillary responsible for what you just said everyone agrees about? If so, is she "finished" by those four deaths, just as the OP of this thread suggests Christie is finished by a traffic jam and some back room political chicanery?

Which is worse?

Benghazi is not a scandal. It is a made up thing by republicans. The Christie thing will be going on well in to the primaries. So yes it will sink him. He will have to answer questions about and money will walk away.

[Anonymous]

Bill Clinton survived all the punches in 1992. Let's see what kind of a politician Christie really is.

[Anonymous]

There's a difference between affairs and abusing the power of your office to get back at people.

[Anonymous]

Anyone watching the speech by the Lt. Governor? I feel like I'm watching a terrible high school play - her acting is horrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't see that this is too bad for him. He retains plausible deniability...

He isn't going to have plausible deniability for long. There are already four different members of his staff involved.

And how many of Obama's staff were involved with the Benghazi cover up using the fake story of a video causing the attack?

zzzzzzzzzzz...... coverup of what. Has everyone agreed that the administration did not provide adequate security, and that it cost the lives of four of our own? Yes.

Assume Christie caused a traffic jam, and then did some other political dirty tricks in Hoboken. Assume he did what MSNBC says.

The premise of this thread is that those scandals sink him as a candidate in 2016.

Are those scandals worse than Benghazi, where you just said "everyone agree(s) the administration did not provide adequate security..."? Is Hillary responsible for what you just said everyone agrees about? If so, is she "finished" by those four deaths, just as the OP of this thread suggests Christie is finished by a traffic jam and some back room political chicanery?

Which is worse?

The damage was worse, but everyone knows that Clinton did not mean to get her own personnel killed.

Benghazi could have been prevented. 911 could also have been prevented. Neither of these involved a "coverup" or corruption, simply mistakes. Therefore a comparison is Christie's chicanary as you called it is apples an oranges.

[Anonymous]

no one blamed 9/11 on a video