Johnny Depp helped to Release CHILD KILLERS from Prison

[Anonymous]

I haven't seen the movies in a long time, but I remember that one of the deceased boys' fathers was REALLY suspicious. Had beaten the boy right before the murder, and awhile after the murders had all of his teeth removed. His son was brutalized far more than the other children, and as covered in bite marks.

Yes, that man was completely and totally insane, I think there was later some suspicion that he had poisioned his wife (who died years later).

[Anonymous]

The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OR FORENSIC MATERIAL TO LINK THEM TO THE CRIME. Even if they were the lowest scum of society there was nothing that linked them to that crime. BTW, the Columbine kids were both from upper middle class families with some minor run ins with the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OR FORENSIC MATERIAL TO LINK THEM TO THE CRIME. Even if they were the lowest scum of society there was nothing that linked them to that crime. BTW, the Columbine kids were both from upper middle class families with some minor run ins with the law.

IT DOESN'T MEAN THEY WEREN'T GUILTY!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OR FORENSIC MATERIAL TO LINK THEM TO THE CRIME. Even if they were the lowest scum of society there was nothing that linked them to that crime. BTW, the Columbine kids were both from upper middle class families with some minor run ins with the law.

IT DOESN'T MEAN THEY WEREN'T GUILTY!

And there was enough to convict them- scott peterson - guilty as hell- also had no evidence or forensic materials so don't quote that.. there was enough to convict them. Watching a (biased) documentary is not enough.

Who cares if columbine guys were middle class- that actually goes against any argument. These kids had run in with the laws and Damien was institutionalized since he threatened to kill people.

[Anonymous]

This is why we have the innocence project.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the innocence project.

The Innocence Project only has the capacity and resources to help a few convicted felons every year. Don't rely on the Innocence Project to exonerate the falsely convicted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OR FORENSIC MATERIAL TO LINK THEM TO THE CRIME. Even if they were the lowest scum of society there was nothing that linked them to that crime. BTW, the Columbine kids were both from upper middle class families with some minor run ins with the law.

So what? Forensic evidence is not the only kind of evidence. Since when is forensic evidence necessary to establish guilt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OR FORENSIC MATERIAL TO LINK THEM TO THE CRIME. Even if they were the lowest scum of society there was nothing that linked them to that crime. BTW, the Columbine kids were both from upper middle class families with some minor run ins with the law.

So what? Forensic evidence is not the only kind of evidence. Since when is forensic evidence necessary to establish guilt?

Are you being sarcastic or serious?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The documentary purposely left out a LOT of information - they did take the angle that because they wore black and were odd- that they were not guilty. If you read the documents- one of them confessed to his attorney providing details no one knew AFTER being convicted. He confessed many times. Damien had threatened to kill his parents, his unborn child as a sacrifice and had bragged about killings. There was no discussion on the documentary on alibis because they had none- they told multiple stories that didn't pan out. I could go on and on since I did end up reading a lot on the case after seeing Paradies Lost series. Many things struck me as odd but it all clicked more - check out this site as starters. http://wm3truth.com/

Just because celebrities are behind something or someone doesn't make them right.

BTW- these three guys could have easily been the Columbine guys - but living in trailers. Odd group of kids- who murder.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OR FORENSIC MATERIAL TO LINK THEM TO THE CRIME. Even if they were the lowest scum of society there was nothing that linked them to that crime. BTW, the Columbine kids were both from upper middle class families with some minor run ins with the law.

So what? Forensic evidence is not the only kind of evidence. Since when is forensic evidence necessary to establish guilt?

Are you being sarcastic or serious?

I am being serious. Please explain your reasoning.