1. she already has a job 2. all the women I interview are either in hose or in pants. even the younguns. |
That's probably because she's not going on an interview! |
haha..this is a MODEL in a catolog with photo-shopping. Quite different than a regular woman going on an interview. |
|
Hose just remind of those days in the office where you got called "honey" and were swatted on the ass. Luckily before my time.
I know, irrational. But I can't help it, it's how I feel. |
Wait a minute! These look like sheer black 'pantyho' (BTW, love the word!), they're definitely not tights! http://www.thelimited.com/detail/travel-collection-pencil-skirt/7753026 |
| So, OP, how'd the interview go? |
|
Wow, I find it hilarious that my question generated 4 pages of answers! FWIW, the suit looks good with grey tights, but definitely too wintery for today's weather.
So I ended up wearing stupid sheer hose (I found a good pair stashed in the back of a drawer). But since I spent the entire interview sitting down at a conference table my legs were on view for a total of 3 minutes walking between the elevator and the office, and I highly doubt it would have mattered if I had gone bare-legged. And 16:34, you are a true friend - the interview went well, thanks for asking.
|
| For the record, Michelle Obama has said that she does NOT wear hose. |
| It all depends on what your legs look like. As you age, your skin becomes thinner and every imperfection shows up (spider veins, etc.). Ultra-sheer hose smooths out your skin tone. The drawback is its cost. Also, for some of us our natural skin color is almost blue-white. Pantyhose solves a lot of problems! |
|
Thought the first comment was hysterical:
http://jezebel.com/5819264/can-kate-middleton-bring-back-pantyhose |
|
I work in a law firm and I see plenty of sheer hose on women of all ages. I especially see it on interview candidates.
Also, I don't get the hose hate. It covers up minor skin imperfections, makes dress shoes more comfortable, acts like a slip so your skirt isn't riding up or bunching, and provides some tummy smoothing if desired. I'd rather be bare-legged, but I'd also rather be wearing comfy sandals and jeans. If I've got to dress up, the hose is not the worst of the annoyances to me. |
| I agree with PPs... hose are like foundation makeup for your legs. If you have perfect skin, I guess you could go to an interview with no makeup. I can't. |
|
Another lawyer here. I do wear bare legs to court in the dog days of summer, but only for something like a docket call or minor motion. For a jury trial, I definitely wear hose. Never tights to court, as they are a more casual look, more appropriate for days in the office. When it's freezing out and I have to go to court, I wear pants.
When in doubt, I dress up, and in professional settings that means hose. It may not the most stylish, but I'm not trying to look hip. I'm trying to look competent, serious, and professional. I would think you'd be hoping for the same when you go for an interview. Once you have the job, then you can worry about style. |
I agree about wearing hose, but like the OP I get runs very easily. I usually have three pair in my briefcase for an interview -- once I got all the way to the receptionist area and snagged my hose on a chair there. Luckily I always arrive a few mins early to have time to duck in the restroom and make a last appearance check, so I was able to change them before the interview. Hope you got the job, OP! |
| I have been seeing a lot more hose (no Hos) lately. |