5 or 7 ct tennis bracelet for everyday wear

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here. If not a tennis bracelet what do you suggest?

There are tons of options that aren’t a tennis bracelet.

Gold or silver toned watch
Bangle
Paper clip chain
Rope chain
Pearl designs
Beads
Trendy designer crap (love, Alhambra, Tiffany)

I don’t mind tennis bracelets but I only see them on boomers.

[Anonymous]

Since tennis bracelets are for old people and Boomers are dying left and right, just go get one at an estate sale, or from an online retailer that deals with estate jewelry.

[Anonymous]

I’d go for an Hermes Kelly diamond bracelet as it would help your pre spend and iykyk street cred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d go for an Hermes Kelly diamond bracelet as it would help your pre spend and iykyk street cred.

I have one of these. My bracelet is shedding diamonds faster than Taylor Swift sheds subtlety in an Easter egg.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d go for an Hermes Kelly diamond bracelet as it would help your pre spend and iykyk street cred.

I have one of these. My bracelet is shedding diamonds faster than Taylor Swift sheds subtlety in an Easter egg.

Why did you pay a lot for cheap and tacky jewelry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anything less than 14 carats is for trailer parks. And you'd only wear that trinket during the day of course. After dark, 25 ct or stay home, you peasant.

I beg your finest pardon. Thin delicate mejuri styled bracelets and necklaces are in. Gaudy tacky looking bracelets for everyday wear are for fatties and trailer parks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:5ctw, but depends on your wrist size, setting style, and how long the bracelet is. I have a small wrist (5.25 inches) and went with 4ctw, minimal 3 prong setting. 3ctw would also be fine.

I love 3 prong settings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tennis bracelets. I can't think of anything more boring.

At least get a lab diamond one, so you don't spend too much on something that screams Zero Imagination.

Aren't you a peach. What do you suggest instead?

Cartier Love bracelet. Way more classic.

lol 🤣 literally. I thought you were going to come with something that wasn’t old and overdone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d go for an Hermes Kelly diamond bracelet as it would help your pre spend and iykyk street cred.

I have one of these. My bracelet is shedding diamonds faster than Taylor Swift sheds subtlety in an Easter egg.

Why did you pay a lot for cheap and tacky jewelry?

I didn't. It was a gift. *shrugs*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing good comes from flashing wealth like this in the workplace as a woman unless you’re in a highly compensated role where comp is widely known / standardized - eg consulting or law partner or lobbyist.

And even in those cases, do you want to be wearing a $20K+ bracelet in client facing roles?

LOL diamonds in general no longer signal wealth. All of my 20-something colleagues and relatives are wearing ginormous lab diamond engagement rings.

I kind of agree. I feel like diamonds are for people TRYING to signal wealth.
I find myself reaching for jewelry lately that is devoid of any diamonds, or traditional gemstones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing good comes from flashing wealth like this in the workplace as a woman unless you’re in a highly compensated role where comp is widely known / standardized - eg consulting or law partner or lobbyist.

And even in those cases, do you want to be wearing a $20K+ bracelet in client facing roles?

LOL diamonds in general no longer signal wealth. All of my 20-something colleagues and relatives are wearing ginormous lab diamond engagement rings.

I kind of agree. I feel like diamonds are for people TRYING to signal wealth.
I find myself reaching for jewelry lately that is devoid of any diamonds, or traditional gemstones.

Yes, I am noticing in my circle the choice is either doubling down on diamonds (the diamond pave JUC is never going away it seems) or skipping bracelets but wearing a nice (Cartier/Rolex/Bvlgari) watch.

I think if the economy can turn up after the next election we'll be throwing back to the MJ watch stack era.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing good comes from flashing wealth like this in the workplace as a woman unless you’re in a highly compensated role where comp is widely known / standardized - eg consulting or law partner or lobbyist.

And even in those cases, do you want to be wearing a $20K+ bracelet in client facing roles?

LOL diamonds in general no longer signal wealth. All of my 20-something colleagues and relatives are wearing ginormous lab diamond engagement rings.

I kind of agree. I feel like diamonds are for people TRYING to signal wealth.
I find myself reaching for jewelry lately that is devoid of any diamonds, or traditional gemstones.

Yes, I am noticing in my circle the choice is either doubling down on diamonds (the diamond pave JUC is never going away it seems) or skipping bracelets but wearing a nice (Cartier/Rolex/Bvlgari) watch.

I think if the economy can turn up after the next election we'll be throwing back to the MJ watch stack era.

Yeah but it's more than that. I think tons of diamonds are looking a little gauche lately, and I don't think it's exclusively tied to the economy. I think it's tied to people looking for authenticity in their lives and the kind of people who wear a lot of diamonds aren't the most authentic people, in many cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing good comes from flashing wealth like this in the workplace as a woman unless you’re in a highly compensated role where comp is widely known / standardized - eg consulting or law partner or lobbyist.

And even in those cases, do you want to be wearing a $20K+ bracelet in client facing roles?

LOL diamonds in general no longer signal wealth. All of my 20-something colleagues and relatives are wearing ginormous lab diamond engagement rings.

I kind of agree. I feel like diamonds are for people TRYING to signal wealth.
I find myself reaching for jewelry lately that is devoid of any diamonds, or traditional gemstones.

Yes, I am noticing in my circle the choice is either doubling down on diamonds (the diamond pave JUC is never going away it seems) or skipping bracelets but wearing a nice (Cartier/Rolex/Bvlgari) watch.

I think if the economy can turn up after the next election we'll be throwing back to the MJ watch stack era.

Yeah but it's more than that. I think tons of diamonds are looking a little gauche lately, and I don't think it's exclusively tied to the economy. I think it's tied to people looking for authenticity in their lives and the kind of people who wear a lot of diamonds aren't the most authentic people, in many cases.

How do diamonds signal more than a Rolex or Cartier? These are clear, branded signs of wealth, more so than diamonds.

[Anonymous]

In the words of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, if you have to ask, you'll never know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the words of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, if you have to ask, you'll never know.

Did Flea say that?