IEP kids aren't getting their services. Is that not enough? |
What burden, objectively, is being placed on students? I'm talking a real cognitive effect, not your emotions and feelings of the calendar. But a real statistical effect that is negative effecting them academically. What can you actually prove with data that shows a burden that is having an effect on student's learning as a whole? |
What is your obsession with "warehousing kids"? I don't want my kids "warehoused". I don't' want them "warehoused" in school until June 17 when teachers stop teaching in May all because we have to make the week of memorial day a 2 day week because of yet another religious holiday. |
Not true, especially for older residents who raised their kids here. My spouse graduated from FCPS as did many of his friends. The grandparents are horrified to see what FCP has become, with grandkids in second grade, not reading, weaker math skills, etc. |
No one here needs to do your googling for you. If you’re curious, just take a quick look at the relationship between declining household, income, and academic outputs. If you create a greater financial burden on students families, you lower their outcomes. This has been settled science since the 60s. Conversely, show the academic benefit to a schedule like this? |
People like PP studiously ignore those of us who say we would a school year with a consistent schedule + a longer summer, because it goes against their simplistic argument that parents just want to warehouse their kids. I am not sure why this person feels such a strong need to defend FCPS. It’s like any criticism of the school district threatens their identity in some way. That or they are a loser who gets their kicks from arguing with people on a message board. Pathetic either way. |
IEP student's get service by hours either by week or by month, per their IEP and FAPE. When in school, they are receiving their legally mandated number of service hours. If the student does not receive the legal amount of services, under section 504 of the rehabilitation act of 1973, they are entitled to compensatory services, which FCPS provides. This was quite common during COVID and is still ongoing today for applicable students. Can you provide a specific example of a student not receiving their legally mandated weekly or monthly service hours while they are IN the school building or not receiving compensatory services due to them being out of the building? I'm sure a lawyer or advocate would have no problem getting, whatever example you may have, their owed services. |
| Sorry for the seemingly dumb question, but when we are discussing the calendar, are we talking about trying to remove days off during the school year and thus moving the last day up vs keeping the number of days off in the school year and keeping the later last day of school? Isn't that just a shell game? How is one better than the other...ACADEMICALLY. I know if has consequences for families that don't have someone that works from home but it seems like alot of people are saying the current calendar fails students academically. How does removing some of the days off and moving the last day up improve things? Thank you. |
+1. This is a great point. If FCPS removes lets say 10 holidays, they'll just reduce them off the end of the school year. Under no circumstance would they extend it (would actually cost parents money via taxes to operate the school additional days). Parent's would still have to pay/be responsible for those 10 days. Robbing Peter to pay Paul. |
To be clear, I never stated that their is an academic benefit. There are just countless people complaining that it is hurtful. Where is the actual proof of that besides their emotions and feelings? The college acceptance rates, graduation rates, SOL scores, SAT scores, etc get released near the end of this year... we will both be able to see if the schedule is beneficial or hurtful. |
It’s difficult to answer because everyone wants something different. Some parents want school to end closer to Memorial Day because they don’t see the value of staying in school after exams. It also offsets childcare to a time of year when there are more college kids in town to support camps and other childcare services. Others are fine with recognizing religious observances but want a calendar that supports consistent 4-5 day weeks so their younger kids can maintain some academic rhythm. The 2025-26 calendar was very bad for this, but the 2026-27 and 2027-28 calendars are much better. So even the “fix the calendar” people are at odds. |
|
So the real answer to the thread:
The Governance Committee will meet on Tuesday, March 17 at 3:00 p.m. and will review the school calendar. So today, right now, you call and email your board members and you say you want to see them support revisions to the calendar. Be clear what you are looking for. Tell them you’re watching (or reviewing since it’s at 3pm) and this is a voting issue for you. |
Lower income= worse outcomes. Settled science. So taxing hourly workers hundreds of thousands of dollars this year in order to make sure we spend five days out at Memorial Day is, yes, bad for students. Like so many things, it is especially bad for low income students, for whom the trade-offs are on things like healthcare, housing, and food and so who are more likely to have been left home unsupervised this year. |
It's been proven by many years of research that young kids do best academically and otherwise with a predictable, consistent schedule. They wake at the same time, arrive at school at the same time, and have the same learning routine consistently. This is how information is best reinforced and retained. My 3rd grader doesn't know if she's coming or going, constantly asking if there is school every day this week or not, or if she gets to come home early this day. It's disruptive to them psychologically and a barrier to learning at their best. |
PP here again. Also, I have a high schooler as well as an elementary student, and while she certainly likes the extra sleep in days, we'd still prefer mostly 5-day weeks and a longer summer. First, there would be more meaningful learning before May when they have AP exams. After that time, most high school classes phone it in for the last few weeks. It's a waste of time. Also, she's found it difficult to find summer work during the very short summer, especially once you factor in a week or two that we spend at the beach. She wanted to do an internship this summer, but couldn't commit to the minimum time because FCPS summer is so short. Just seems better to have an efficient and effective school year and let families plan for summer when there are loads of camps for younger kids and learning and working opportunities for older kids, rather than have a very choppy stressful school year, then a short summer that makes it hard to have meaningful experiences. |