Who gets into Stanford unhooked?

[Anonymous]

For what it's worth, if it makes anyone or their kid feel better, I am a legacy (parent went undergrad) to Stanford who did not get in but did get in to several Ivies and peer schools for which I had no connection/tie/hooks.

Granted this was 20+ years ago, but Stanford admitted the kid in my high school who spent a year studying abroad in another (at the-time "unusual") country in HS and had taught himself that language. Meanwhile, my bright-well-rounded-research-athletics-top-grades-top-rigor-leadership self (I am not trying to be self-promotional, but truly) was admitted to several Ivies and Stanford peers but not Stanford.

So even legacy on top of the rest is not enough if they decide they only want to admit one kid from your senior class!

Also, my sense having grown up around the children of Stanford alumni (given my parent's college friends) is that it is very unusual outside of a very small number of high schools, for them to admit more than 1 student from a particular high school if you are outside of California. They admit very heavily in California.

[Anonymous]

My kids got in W school no hooks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Colleague's wife applied from SFBA, had zero hooks, middle middle-class family, good academics (not stellar), was accepted, and then graduated.

She had studied a less common language in HS. Her ECs all lined up with interest in that part of the world. Her application essay indicated her desire to study that language. She got a degree in that language.

My guess is that they needed students for that language program that year. I doubt this is reproducible for any popular major/degree.

Isn’t that how Elizabeth Holmes got in? Studied mandarin in China when it was less popular to do so?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For what it's worth, if it makes anyone or their kid feel better, I am a legacy (parent went undergrad) to Stanford who did not get in but did get in to several Ivies and peer schools for which I had no connection/tie/hooks.

Granted this was 20+ years ago, but Stanford admitted the kid in my high school who spent a year studying abroad in another (at the-time "unusual") country in HS and had taught himself that language. Meanwhile, my bright-well-rounded-research-athletics-top-grades-top-rigor-leadership self (I am not trying to be self-promotional, but truly) was admitted to several Ivies and Stanford peers but not Stanford.

So even legacy on top of the rest is not enough if they decide they only want to admit one kid from your senior class!

Also, my sense having grown up around the children of Stanford alumni (given my parent's college friends) is that it is very unusual outside of a very small number of high schools, for them to admit more than 1 student from a particular high school if you are outside of California. They admit very heavily in California.

I’m a third gen legacy and I agree w/everything you said. High schools in CA will give you a better chance than similar schools in Long Island or NJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Grinders.
People who focus on being productive and gaining accolades every minute of every hour of the day.
2 in DCs class got in REA that way.

The unhooked Sidwell admit in my kid’s recent class fits this description. Plus they had a gripping essay topic.

how do you know another kid's essay topic?

Because this person was a friend with my son at the time and they discussed their personal statement essays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meaning none of these: legacy, athlete, FGLI/Questbridge, donor/celeb/VIP kids. What are they looking for? Do normal people get in with highest SAT, GPA, top rigor and not oversubscribed majors (not comp sci, engineering, business, eco, pre med)?

The kid from my flyover meh high school who got in isn't really hooked but he does have older siblings and parents in academia. He was able to get a research position in high school at another college in the summer. He wasn't even top of the class. Not an athlete. Just a curious kid who caught an AO's attention.

Being from a flyover state is a hook.

That doesn’t meet the definition of a hook. It’s a weight on the scale but a student from North Dakota doesn’t get put in a separate bucket the way actual hooked applicants do.

[Anonymous]

my son got in last year from nyc pubic. top student, but debate was his thing. wasn't a national champ or anything, but had a lot of awards. he applied for humanities.

[Anonymous]

My neighbor’s kid, a TJ girl got in H S Y about 4 or 5 years ago and chose to attend S. Her dad said she was unhooked, but had the highest GPA, some internship experience, and really outstanding essays.

[Anonymous]

The kid I know that got in recently wasn’t hooked. He had straight As, I am assuming high SAT, won (or placed high, not sure if actually #1) in some CS and research competitions nationally, state awards for music instruments. No sports or school clubs. High class rigor with a couple yrs post Calc math. Public school, not east coast, that doesn’t have many students applying to Stanford (but not underprivileged), Asian.