| Yeah, I know two females who were admitted with no hooks — one last year one this year. Tons of activities, top grades and test scores rigorous coursework, very personable engaging people. |
| I know several kids from TJ got into Stanford with YoungArts awards on top of great academic stats. |
You mean high achievers? |
Good. Hope he didn't get steamed later. |
| Top grades and perfect SATs, lots of writing competitions, English major |
Yes but only in specific activities that have an established ranking system and public relations effort. High achievement on things the well-known judges don't care about don't matter. Not in a hobby that doesn't turn into a trophy. |
He had a lot of raw talent. |
Ahaha, sorry, couldn't help myself. In hindsight, that would have made a stunning EC for any kid, too bad we didn't think of it earlier. |
|
Stanford is probably the most difficult college to get in without hooks. Almost impossible to get in even for top students with max stats. Last year only 4 MCPS students got in. Same for Harvard. Their admission is different than the merit-based colleges like MIT, CMU, JHU.
"Stanford to continue legacy admissions through 2026 despite state ban." https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/ |
The unhooked Sidwell admit in my kid’s recent class fits this description. Plus they had a gripping essay topic. |
"Unhooked Sidwell" - that must be the joke if the day. 60k/year Sidwell tuition |
| The kids we know are super pointy and unbearably overconfident with max rigor. |
| None from our high school which routinely sends 20% to Ivy league + MIT. Stanford admits are always hooked. |
| National awards in ice skating and equestrian (different ppl) |
| Started non profit, genuinely kind kid, research driven with publication, 12+ APs, great test scores. Got into a bunch of ivies as well unhooked. |