| Nothing more pathetic than K-12 students doing a walk out / protest in modern times. Especially at a private school. |
Yet sadly, they didn’t create enough awareness or outrage then to move the needle in the election. Honestly this is a perfect example of confusing momentum with causation. Yes, students protested after Parkland. That absolutely mattered emotionally and culturally. Nobody disputes that. But the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act didn’t materialize because teenagers walked out of algebra in 2018. It passed four years later after entirely different shootings, bipartisan Senate negotiations, and heavy lobbying by multiple long-standing advocacy groups. Even supporters acknowledge protests alone don’t move Congress without institutional deal-making behind the scenes. And the “250 laws passed” statistic? That’s pulled from the organization’s own promotional material. Laws passed since something happened are not laws passed because of it. Correlation is not causation. If marches automatically produced policy outcomes, every cause with a big rally would be rewriting federal law every spring. What March for Our Lives undeniably did was energize young activists and create media attention. That’s influence. But claiming it directly delivered federal legislation or made kids safer is a much bigger leap, especially when (incredibly tragically) school shootings and youth gun deaths remain ongoing national problems years later. |
| All you have heard is just rumor! |
Yawn |
?? |
That reply was actually more pathetic. |
High school kids have been staging walkouts since forever. At least these kids have a cause better than the bad cafeteria food walkouts we did in the 80s. |
+1 |