More fact-free ranting? How predictable, and how consistent with DSM-V descriptions for people engaging in your behavior. I wonder which diagnoses infantile "name-calling" is associated with? Seems mostly to be narcissistic personality disorder, associated with frustration and envy at clinically significant levels? |
This is pathetic. A Beatles-referencing hasbarist clown. |
As opposed to a Hebrew-speaking clown? |
No actual rebuttal, but more name-calling. Narcissistic personality disorder, anyone? |
Zionist: One who supports the goal of the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Eretz Yisra'el, consistent with U.N. Resolution 181, adopted in 1947. Zionism's goal was fulfilled in 1948, with the creation of the State of Israel. Terrorist: Palestinian Arabs who engage in violent, criminal acts; undertaking, organizing, assisting, financing, encouraging or tolerating acts against Israel, directed at persons or property and of such a nature as to create a state of terror in the minds of public figures, groups of persons or the general public, in order to compel Israel to grant advantages or to act in a specific way pleasing to Palestinians. It's apparent which one you favor. |
^ Dershowitz wannabe with the same lover-spotted charm and endless invective. Dumb old dork. |
Stop bringing up Palestinians in defense of your fake Israel propaganda. You don’teven agree with international organizations. Again, smoke and mirrors nonsense. |
Israel was born through terrorism. The original people who lived in the area of Israel were the Palestinians. They land, property and lives were stolen by Israel. The only way forward is for Israel to address the crimes against humanity that created Israel. Israel must allow right of return, full citizenship to all Palestinians who were forced to flee, compensation for pain, suffering and loss of property. |
Yes, all true. [I have to throw in the following because of irrelevant name calling by a bunch of mouth breathers: Peter Beinart is a practicing orthodox jew and has degrees from Yale and Oxford. Beinart was the editor of The New Republic. He has worked for many other media companies including Haaretz, after he called for a one-state solution.] Peter Beinart's one-state solution, which he has argued for over 10 years, is the only path forward. |
Peter Beinart: 'I don't support a Jewish state' |
You never asked, but here’s what I actually favor … 1. Major reform in Israel, resulting in an actual democratic state with appropriate restoration of Palestinian rights, including meaningful reparations in many cases. U.N. “assistance” to ensure peaceful coexistence with an eye toward a true blooming of regional harmony. 2. Destruction, without provision of any quarter whatsoever, of Hamas, the Likud party, any other militant / terrorist groups in Israel or the (formerly) occupied territories, and any other political groups in Israel or the (formerly) occupied territories that refuse to contribute to a peaceful outcome. You won’t disavow? Gallows. 3. Unrelenting social exile for anyone in the U.S. who unconditionally supported Israel’s policies and actions of the past 75+ years (and who won’t disavow now), and anyone who unconditionally supported the policies and actions of Palestinian leadership over the past 75+ years (and who won’t disavow now). That’s a good start regarding what I favor, actually. You’re welcome - I saved you some time making up an array of false claims about me. |