Where do I see the top 80 clubs according to this ranking??? |
The problem with the statement "better" is its not true. There is a small number of clubs in all leagues that consistently win and place players in college. They are the same clubs every year and it wouldnt matter which league they played in. This is why people make fun of ECNL hats. If your kid isnt playing at one of the clubs that win youre a crash test dummy. |
Not on instagram. He also took down the graphic you are seeing a few posts up on this thread. |
I agree with this. Its just something for people to fight and argue about. |
While the bolded part is true to some extent, it's about a 4:1 ratio in favor of ECNL when it comes to high end college soccer placements, across a pool of relatively same number of teams (within GA vs. ECNL). That ratio may change over time for sure, no one can predict the future. Just pick the spot for your kid that's the right fit, and let them enjoy the ride along the way. The college recruiting process will be more stressful than you think it will be, regardless of the league you're in. |
Its not "ECNL" its a few clubs that dominate in ECNL that place players consistently. GA is the same way. If imsoccerdork wanted to represent data objectively he'd show the clubs placing players without any league affiliation. |
Nope, still there ... https://www.instagram.com/p/DVoYmO9jfWp/ |
This is where people don’t understand what the data means. 4:1 placement ratio does NOT mean your daughter has a 4 times better chance of playing D1 simply by being in ECNL. That’s obviously what this IMYS guy and ECNL coaches want to sell you. But it’s not how it works. It’s funny how many idiot parents I hear quoting this number on the sidelines. |
What's not funny is how the competition starts to separate as kids get older. GA is fine, but it's definitely Tier 2 (and yes this includes the "dominant" GA clubs. It's ultimately a pissing contest unless your kid is actually top tier and in that case it really doesn't matter which league they're in. |
| Maybe IMYS Guy is focusing too much on showcases ... Look what's happening in Michigan, for example, more at a regional level ... This is a MI Jaguars coach (GA/MLSN) who recently took a job to start soccer a women's program at Wayne State University (D2) ... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-gHw5WdnpmA |
I listened to the podcast and thought it was pretty interesting. Attendance at a regional showcase seemed to be pretty solid. I know some of the VA clubs have their own showcase events, but they are much smaller scale than what happened in MI. I think events like Jeff Cup though are still drawing coaches to their games and it's a chance for GA/ECNL clubs to play another rather being in their own closed systems. That's part of the draw, IMO. |
Yes, this makes sense. College coaches have only so much bandwidth. Maybe some are reprioritizing away from national showcases (ECNL numbers for coaches aren't what they were it seems as well). It all argues for the return to a more integrated pyramid vs. multiple closed leagues. Personally, I wish tournaments with champions/competition for something would make more of a comeback beyond the various league national titles. |
Most of the VA team go to the regional showcases in PA/NJ like PDA and Penn Fusion’s which have good college attendance. This is just one more reason why the ECNL/GA pissing contest makes no sense because there are these regional events where teams from both leagues show up. |
Then what does the data mean to you? Serious question - not trying to be snarky. If the number of teams is relatively equal between the two leagues, and the ratio is true, does that mean that there are just four times the talent (concentrated at the top) in ECNL than GA? |
https://www.instagram.com/p/DUdvVHQFR9N/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DVENZLfjSv7/?img_index=1 You can try and stand up for what GA might become down the line, but right now the numbers don't lie. Exposure is greater at ECNL. Good players in both leagues will get noticed. |