+1 |
Meh. Bezos is already sufficiently undermined the Post to do Trump’s bidding. Damage has been done. I’m not going to keep my subscription as a means to “stick it to Trump.” To the contrary, at this point keeping the subscription is endorsing Bezos’s spinelessness. No thank you. |
| Welcome to Magadonia where there is state news only and lies and or propaganda to keep the cult base stupids in line |
We can do two things at once. I’ve canceled Amazon Prime, haven’t ordered from Amazon for almost a year now, and, also, cancelling my Post subscription. The Post doesn’t value what I value from a paper and while I care about their journalists, I suspect many who are still there will either leave soon or get onboard with Bezos’s Trump friendly agenda. The Editorial Board sure has. |
You know the editorial page has nothing to do with the rest of the paper, right? They're completely separate entities. That's how it is at every major newspaper in this country. |
The reason they're cutting metro is because people are canceling their subscriptions. It's not that they don't want to cover local news. They do, but they don't have the money now because everything thinks they're sticking it to Bezos by cancelling their subscriptions. So you're creating the problem that you're complaining about. |
| I get my local news from neighborhood blogs. |
|
I'm a little surprised how critical people are about the Post's recent news. The opinion/editorial board is absolute garbage now, but the actual stories continue to be pretty good. They've done a great job covering ICE and a decent job covering the other government ineptitude and ridiculous things going on. (Their science coverage has never been good.)
I'm afraid if everyone covers no one will cover that stuff. The NYTimes has not been nearly as critical of the administration in its actual news coverage as teh Post has. A week or so ago, the Post ran a whole article that was just summarizing the SNL episode making fun of Trump. It was not news, but it was also NOT Trump-friendly. I was very surprised that no one yanked that article. I htought it was the journalists basically thinking "I can't mock Trump myself, but I can report on SNL mocking him, as if it's entertainment news." Clever. In general, I agree with PP's that said that cancelling your WP subscription does not hurt Bezos, and probably helps Trump, but does undermine the long term viability of what has been one of the important papers in the world. |
For free |
|
The Kojo Nnamdi show has great local politics coverage. As does WAMU. Not as comprehensive as the Post, but still something.
|
Separate, sure. But the editorial page absolutely influences, infiltrates, and controls the reporting. The readers know it and the reporters know it. |
| I' never read about sports and I don't read book reviews. I won't miss them. |
That's hilariously wrong. Time to take the tin foil hat off. |
| Subscribe to ProPublica and other orgs so they can hire the former WaPo reporters who left Jeff Bezos' propaganda rag |
Nah. It’s like going to the Smithsonian and seeing that history is being re-written, altered, and falsified (sound familiar?) and deciding that you just can’t support that approach. Hopefully, both institutions return to their roots. |