“Pam Bondi Offers To Pull ICE out of Minneapolis if Voter Files Handed Over”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

If not Nazi, why Nazi-shaped?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

We don’t like them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

Per Google AI:”
Key Aspects of Nazi Comparisons

Godwin's Law: Coined by Mike Godwin, this internet adage states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%. Once such a comparison is made, the discussion is often considered finished or "lost".

Reductio ad Hitlerum: This is a logical fallacy where an argument or person is deemed wrong solely because it was also supported by Hitler or the Nazi party.

Offensiveness and Trivialization: Critics argue that comparing modern political disagreements to the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others is deeply offensive, particularly to Holocaust survivors and their families. It is viewed as reducing the "ultimate evil" of the Holocaust to a mere political insult.

Common Targets: Comparisons are frequently used in heated debates surrounding:
Immigration: Comparing border enforcement or agencies like ICE to
Nazis”


Arguments for Caution: Many historians and commentators argue that nothing in modern, democratic discourse truly compares to the industrialized murder of the Holocaust. Using these comparisons is seen as a lazy, shock-value tactic that fails to persuade anyone except the already biased.

[Anonymous]

What will they do with the voter registration records?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What will they do with the voter registration records?

If you can imagine it, they will consider it. They will do anything they think they can get away with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She doesn't lead ICE. Greg Bobino (who leads BP, part of DHS) said DHS is there until every last violent criminal target is apprehended.

So who is right? Bondy? Or Bobino?

Do they have a list? How many violent criminals have they apprehended? How more still there? They are so full of shit.

Sanctuary cities allow their local police to assist in finding and capturing violent criminals. I have a feeling there aren’t any.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

Per Google AI:”
Key Aspects of Nazi Comparisons

Godwin's Law: Coined by Mike Godwin, this internet adage states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%. Once such a comparison is made, the discussion is often considered finished or "lost".

Reductio ad Hitlerum: This is a logical fallacy where an argument or person is deemed wrong solely because it was also supported by Hitler or the Nazi party.

Offensiveness and Trivialization: Critics argue that comparing modern political disagreements to the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others is deeply offensive, particularly to Holocaust survivors and their families. It is viewed as reducing the "ultimate evil" of the Holocaust to a mere political insult.

Common Targets: Comparisons are frequently used in heated debates surrounding:
Immigration: Comparing border enforcement or agencies like ICE to
Nazis”


Arguments for Caution: Many historians and commentators argue that nothing in modern, democratic discourse truly compares to the industrialized murder of the Holocaust. Using these comparisons is seen as a lazy, shock-value tactic that fails to persuade anyone except the already biased.

No, nothing compares to Germany and their brutal murdering spree. The word Nazi has been overused. But Stephen Miller and the other people pulling the puppet strings are doing exactly what Hitler did to gain power.

The Nazi Stormtroopers went to places where “communists” and other undesirables gathered and took them away violently. ICE while not as disciplined or smart as the German thugs they are doing the same thing to mostly Latinos and as Miller said, they are exempt from any charges including murder.

Trump, like Hitler has been picking away at the US Constitution, the longest running constitution in the world.

If you watch any of the documentaries on Hitler you will see similarities. I can’t even imagine how Germany did what they did. Those concentration camps, the sick twisted medical experiments on Jews or the handicapped. The country was broke right before that.

So we won’t see mass murder we do see civil rights eroding, the Republican Party terrified of their own shadows, the democrats can’t get it together and the Supreme Court is suspect.

If people start walking around with patches on their clothes with a big I on it, we’re in trouble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

Per Google AI:”
Key Aspects of Nazi Comparisons

Godwin's Law: Coined by Mike Godwin, this internet adage states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%. Once such a comparison is made, the discussion is often considered finished or "lost".

Reductio ad Hitlerum: This is a logical fallacy where an argument or person is deemed wrong solely because it was also supported by Hitler or the Nazi party.

Offensiveness and Trivialization: Critics argue that comparing modern political disagreements to the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others is deeply offensive, particularly to Holocaust survivors and their families. It is viewed as reducing the "ultimate evil" of the Holocaust to a mere political insult.

Common Targets: Comparisons are frequently used in heated debates surrounding:
Immigration: Comparing border enforcement or agencies like ICE to
Nazis”


Arguments for Caution: Many historians and commentators argue that nothing in modern, democratic discourse truly compares to the industrialized murder of the Holocaust. Using these comparisons is seen as a lazy, shock-value tactic that fails to persuade anyone except the already biased.

No, nothing compares to Germany and their brutal murdering spree. The word Nazi has been overused. But Stephen Miller and the other people pulling the puppet strings are doing exactly what Hitler did to gain power.

The Nazi Stormtroopers went to places where “communists” and other undesirables gathered and took them away violently. ICE while not as disciplined or smart as the German thugs they are doing the same thing to mostly Latinos and as Miller said, they are exempt from any charges including murder.

Trump, like Hitler has been picking away at the US Constitution, the longest running constitution in the world.

If you watch any of the documentaries on Hitler you will see similarities. I can’t even imagine how Germany did what they did. Those concentration camps, the sick twisted medical experiments on Jews or the handicapped. The country was broke right before that.

So we won’t see mass murder we do see civil rights eroding, the Republican Party terrified of their own shadows, the democrats can’t get it together and the Supreme Court is suspect.

If people start walking around with patches on their clothes with a big I on it, we’re in trouble.

I think people use Nazi because they are the largest example we learn about in schools. There are other cases of government repression that happened across the globe, but most Americans don’t learn about them.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

Per Google AI:”
Key Aspects of Nazi Comparisons

Godwin's Law: Coined by Mike Godwin, this internet adage states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%. Once such a comparison is made, the discussion is often considered finished or "lost".

Reductio ad Hitlerum: This is a logical fallacy where an argument or person is deemed wrong solely because it was also supported by Hitler or the Nazi party.

Offensiveness and Trivialization: Critics argue that comparing modern political disagreements to the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others is deeply offensive, particularly to Holocaust survivors and their families. It is viewed as reducing the "ultimate evil" of the Holocaust to a mere political insult.

Common Targets: Comparisons are frequently used in heated debates surrounding:
Immigration: Comparing border enforcement or agencies like ICE to
Nazis”


Arguments for Caution: Many historians and commentators argue that nothing in modern, democratic discourse truly compares to the industrialized murder of the Holocaust. Using these comparisons is seen as a lazy, shock-value tactic that fails to persuade anyone except the already biased.

Godwin himself says the comparison is apt in the case of Trump:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/19/godwins-law-trump-hitler-00132427

And, speaking of lazy tactics that fail to persuade, outsourcing your brain to Google AI is pretty lazy.

[Anonymous]

BREAKING: A federal judge is weighing Attorney General Pam Bondi’s blackmail letter to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as evidence that the administration is using the presence of armed federal agents as coercion to achieve policy goals. https://trib.al/9L4sFJl

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why wouldn’t they want to turn them over? Are they hiding something?

They should take the offer.

You are a good little MAGA Nazi.

What’s with you people and Nazis?

Per Google AI:”
Key Aspects of Nazi Comparisons

Godwin's Law: Coined by Mike Godwin, this internet adage states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%. Once such a comparison is made, the discussion is often considered finished or "lost".

Reductio ad Hitlerum: This is a logical fallacy where an argument or person is deemed wrong solely because it was also supported by Hitler or the Nazi party.

Offensiveness and Trivialization: Critics argue that comparing modern political disagreements to the systematic genocide of six million Jews and millions of others is deeply offensive, particularly to Holocaust survivors and their families. It is viewed as reducing the "ultimate evil" of the Holocaust to a mere political insult.

Common Targets: Comparisons are frequently used in heated debates surrounding:
Immigration: Comparing border enforcement or agencies like ICE to
Nazis”


Arguments for Caution: Many historians and commentators argue that nothing in modern, democratic discourse truly compares to the industrialized murder of the Holocaust. Using these comparisons is seen as a lazy, shock-value tactic that fails to persuade anyone except the already biased.

Godwin himself says the comparison is apt in the case of Trump:

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/19/godwins-law-trump-hitler-00132427

And, speaking of lazy tactics that fail to persuade, outsourcing your brain to Google AI is pretty lazy.

So what if it fits? It's awful on its own account.