| The first one the builder paid too much for that dump. Now he's trying to recoup his losses. |
Meh. I remember when house hunting, that ugly new builds who used every square foot to maximize square footage were sitting around even when the market was hot. We opted for a smaller house with a yard over some larger cheaper options, because if you have kids, what's the point of having a house if there's no yard space to play? |
We moved from a 194's colonial to a new build. Way more efficient systems. 3x the size of old house, heat and electric use barely more than 1x. Try again. (p.s. I already overpay in taxes to this state and piggyback county, you are welcome for the services!!)
|
Yes, that is what happens with school clusters that are far too large and land that is super valuable, inside the beltway. $2.45M just down the street on Sonoma. Many sold homes within a few blocks that are >$2.5M. School cluster does not matter as much (as neighborhood and location do) when private school cost is a rounding error in that income bracket. |
|
I’ve lived in that neighborhood 15 years. Everyone thinks the developers over shot the market. Slightly smaller and more in the 1.5 to 2M range would have sold.
Also I don’t know what’s going on with the front yard for that first one but my dog is freakin obsessed with it. I think every animal is peeing all over it or something. I have to drag him away every night. Also I think they are both ugly. There are some tear downs in the neighborhood that are so nice — there’s one ion Grant that is very big but so nice looking. These are expensive but look cheap. |