Are the Blair and RMIB magnet programs even any good?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here are this years numbers for RMIB I think they look really promising I’m not sure why we’re citing data from 2023 in here

The Mean SAT scores for the RMIB Class of 2025: 1468
• Evidence Based Reading and Writing: 740 Mathematics 738 Total - 1468
• National Merit Scholarship Competition Finalists - Class of 2025 - 23

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/contentassets/85ddf5c7e43e4729af561245c7f8fce8/5482_26_rmhs-profile-insert.pdf?usp=sharing

This makes me question the math skills these kids have. Or at least their parents.

Before I judge you, can you explain your comment?

Do the addition in the bolder part and see what you get.

[Anonymous]

^^ bolded — autocorrect

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I get disproportionate number of interns from these programs where I work (STEM related). They are extremely talented.

I only hire my HS interns (more than 20) from Blair and TJ. They are all extremely talented and strong self-driven. I’ll not hire any more in the future from Blair once the regional model starts.

Well that's pretty obnoxious. You won't even consider a student who might be a good fit? What about now -- you won't consider a student who goes to their home school and takes a heavy load of AP STEM courses? That says a lot about you.

If you have ever supervised a HS intern, you’ll know it’s a service rather than a normal working relationship. You pay them but they don’t know a tiny bit about your research, but your time is also very limited. You won’t have time to teach them from scratch or meet them on a daily basis. What you can do is handing them a bunch of references, sample codes, lab materials, and expert them to start training themselves like a graduate student. That’s way way beyond a straight-A transcript with a bunch of AP courses. The reason I trust Blair and TJ is I know kids can survive there with a good resume can learn whatever they are requested to learn with minimal instruction.

Aside from your trashiness, Blair admits kids from test scores and a very short essay, which is very easy for you duplicate. And TJ already switched to a de-merited admission process years ago.

Still, top students from TJ keep the quality before and after the watering-down (BTW: TJ didn't de-merit the admission, their new process water down the program but the top is still the top).

Calling me trash doesn't help increase your kid's admission rate. I like smart and self-driven students. I provide them opportunities to contribute to the world in their early ages and intrigue them to consider working in R&D in the future. What did you do to make our next generation more competitive? By calling educator a trash?

I teach my kids English grammar, and I tutor all interested students at their level of ability, not filtered based on my lazy bigotry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I get disproportionate number of interns from these programs where I work (STEM related). They are extremely talented.

I only hire my HS interns (more than 20) from Blair and TJ. They are all extremely talented and strong self-driven. I’ll not hire any more in the future from Blair once the regional model starts.

Well that's pretty obnoxious. You won't even consider a student who might be a good fit? What about now -- you won't consider a student who goes to their home school and takes a heavy load of AP STEM courses? That says a lot about you.

If you have ever supervised a HS intern, you’ll know it’s a service rather than a normal working relationship. You pay them but they don’t know a tiny bit about your research, but your time is also very limited. You won’t have time to teach them from scratch or meet them on a daily basis. What you can do is handing them a bunch of references, sample codes, lab materials, and expert them to start training themselves like a graduate student. That’s way way beyond a straight-A transcript with a bunch of AP courses. The reason I trust Blair and TJ is I know kids can survive there with a good resume can learn whatever they are requested to learn with minimal instruction.

Aside from your trashiness, Blair admits kids from test scores and a very short essay, which is very easy for you duplicate. And TJ already switched to a de-merited admission process years ago.

Still, top students from TJ keep the quality before and after the watering-down (BTW: TJ didn't de-merit the admission, their new process water down the program but the top is still the top).

Calling me trash doesn't help increase your kid's admission rate. I like smart and self-driven students. I provide them opportunities to contribute to the world in their early ages and intrigue them to consider working in R&D in the future. What did you do to make our next generation more competitive? By calling educator a trash?

I teach my kids English grammar, and I tutor all interested students at their level of ability, not filtered based on my lazy bigotry.

You apparently don’t know the difference between K-12 education and R&D. The former is required by law to every kid. The latter is selective. I pay my interns and I can’t be selective? Do you pay to get your students and you just recruit everyone that needs help? If yes, that’s called charity.