GMU Law Stats!!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:GMU Law - where they teach you to undermine 250 years of legal precedent and pledge blind faith to Donald Trump rather than the constitution of the United States.

Thanks but no thanks.


Oh, spare us all. I bet you have no issue with the LWNJs coming out of Yale Law and Stanford Law, to name just two. You simply want all lawyers to be far left. Get a grip.
NP


+1. And utter nonsense. There are students at GMU of all political stripes.


+2
Only in DCUM-land would posters paint a school like GMU Law as being somehow in thrall to Donald Trump, simply because it's not a heavily far-left leaning school like most. How refreshing to have some diversity of thought!



Any law school named after SCALIA is not a neutral place. Please. And just take a look at their student orgs to get a feel for the culture.


The culture looks great to me - there's a wide variety of student organizations available.

https://www.law.gmu.edu/students/orgs/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:GMU Law - where they teach you to undermine 250 years of legal precedent and pledge blind faith to Donald Trump rather than the constitution of the United States.

Thanks but no thanks.

Thank you for reaching out.


You have no idea what you are talking about. I am a Harvard Law graduate and wish we had had one law school in the nation like GMU back in the early 80s, but it didn't exist. So students who had a moderate conservative/Republican bent (which means OMG we believe in more power being given to the states and the end to a Imperial presidency and a bloated federal government - just like the founding fathers wanted) had no law school to attend So we students went to harvard/stanford/yale and kept our mouths shut because the liberals of the 60s 70s and early 80s had CONTROL of the law schools.


Apparently the University of Chicago law school doesn't exist.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: