The right wing fighting a fantasy war over sorority dances

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

Sydney Sweeney is only important to RWNJs and Gen Z. Some men may find her “hot” but she is not pretty or unique - i.e. doesn’t have long term Hollywood potential

Try harder.

I know plenty of GenZ kids who are indifferent to Sweeny’s ad and think she’s a bad actress. This GenXer agrees with them. This was a hugely successful ad! It got people talking about a mid brand selling basic jeans by a woman who can’t act. Success!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Oh nice! Now lets do the Hutus and Tutsis, and the people of the South Sudan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

Either you didn’t see the ad that had “GENES” crossed out and replaced with the word “JEANS” — or you saw it and didn’t understand the implications. (NP)

I agree it was about genetics because its a fun play on words. I don't see how Sydney talking about her genes is a call to arms to murder all non-blondes.

You know, you never see hot people getting upset about someone being proud of their looks. I'm just saying. You all are telling on yourselves, you got mad that she's hot and now you're pretending she's promoting advocating to abort all black babies or whatever. GTFO.

She said thinks her genes are good. Go ahead and buy the products she is hawking if you like that type of ad.

I bought the whole outfit. The jeans, the jacket. People like their families, their heritage, etc and that's a good thing. It's ridiculous to claim it means she wants to murder people who look different.

You bought the whole outfit? I'm always surprised when people fall for ads. They're so manipulative. Most of us with a modicum of intelligence know that we are never going to look like the actors in ads if we buy the things they're selling (the face cream is not going to make you look younger, the jeans are not going to give you a nice ass if you don't already have one, etc.).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

Why is it that we can talk about the good things of other races, but only the bad things about Europeans? That seems racist. I really don't know what you think some random Polish person had to do with American slavery. And by the numbers, black Americans have way more old white American ancestry (eg slave owner ancestry) than the average European. Yet they get a pass while people who've got nothing to do with any of this are inherently evil.

You guys really need to stop. You've lost the culture. They listened when it was reasonable but you have jumped the shark and are filled with hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Is this where some people’s brain go when they see a ad trying to for fun word play?

Clearly Sydney is talking about her genes, as an individual that is good looking, and not about all white/blonde/blue eyed people’s genes. How does, I’m hot and have good genetics, translate in someone’s brain to only people that look like me racially should have children.

It’s such a leap, there is clearly some mental issues if eugenics is where your mind goes when watching the commercial. Do a favor to your family and friends and get some therapy. And I’m as Democrat as they come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

Why is it that we can talk about the good things of other races, but only the bad things about Europeans? That seems racist. I really don't know what you think some random Polish person had to do with American slavery. And by the numbers, black Americans have way more old white American ancestry (eg slave owner ancestry) than the average European. Yet they get a pass while people who've got nothing to do with any of this are inherently evil.

You guys really need to stop. You've lost the culture. They listened when it was reasonable but you have jumped the shark and are filled with hate.

What the heck does the Birther nonsense have to do with Europeans. That was right here in the good old USA!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

Either you didn’t see the ad that had “GENES” crossed out and replaced with the word “JEANS” — or you saw it and didn’t understand the implications. (NP)

I agree it was about genetics because its a fun play on words. I don't see how Sydney talking about her genes is a call to arms to murder all non-blondes.

You know, you never see hot people getting upset about someone being proud of their looks. I'm just saying. You all are telling on yourselves, you got mad that she's hot and now you're pretending she's promoting advocating to abort all black babies or whatever. GTFO.

She said thinks her genes are good. Go ahead and buy the products she is hawking if you like that type of ad.

I bought the whole outfit. The jeans, the jacket. People like their families, their heritage, etc and that's a good thing. It's ridiculous to claim it means she wants to murder people who look different.

You bought the whole outfit? I'm always surprised when people fall for ads. They're so manipulative. Most of us with a modicum of intelligence know that we are never going to look like the actors in ads if we buy the things they're selling (the face cream is not going to make you look younger, the jeans are not going to give you a nice ass if you don't already have one, etc.).

Yes the whole thing. Looks fantastic and I've gotten tons of compliments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

Why is it that we can talk about the good things of other races, but only the bad things about Europeans? That seems racist. I really don't know what you think some random Polish person had to do with American slavery. And by the numbers, black Americans have way more old white American ancestry (eg slave owner ancestry) than the average European. Yet they get a pass while people who've got nothing to do with any of this are inherently evil.

You guys really need to stop. You've lost the culture. They listened when it was reasonable but you have jumped the shark and are filled with hate.

What the heck does the Birther nonsense have to do with Europeans. That was right here in the good old USA!

Apparently there was some question as to the quality of Obama's jeans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

Why is it that we can talk about the good things of other races, but only the bad things about Europeans? That seems racist. I really don't know what you think some random Polish person had to do with American slavery. And by the numbers, black Americans have way more old white American ancestry (eg slave owner ancestry) than the average European. Yet they get a pass while people who've got nothing to do with any of this are inherently evil.

You guys really need to stop. You've lost the culture. They listened when it was reasonable but you have jumped the shark and are filled with hate.

What the heck does the Birther nonsense have to do with Europeans. That was right here in the good old USA!

Do you know where white genes come from, for the most part?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

Why is it that we can talk about the good things of other races, but only the bad things about Europeans? That seems racist. I really don't know what you think some random Polish person had to do with American slavery. And by the numbers, black Americans have way more old white American ancestry (eg slave owner ancestry) than the average European. Yet they get a pass while people who've got nothing to do with any of this are inherently evil.

You guys really need to stop. You've lost the culture. They listened when it was reasonable but you have jumped the shark and are filled with hate.

What the heck does the Birther nonsense have to do with Europeans. That was right here in the good old USA!

Do you know where white genes come from, for the most part?

The birther thing was not about Trump's mom genes from Europe. That's not what it was about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

You know very well that it was. There is no such thing as good genes without bad genes. Blue eyes good...white baby voiced woman good... We know what the ad is about. You'd have to be a moron to not understand what it is about. Are you a moron?

What are you after? Should I tell my kids, of European heritage, that they can't be proud of their family and ancestors? There's Black Heritage Month, AAPC month, Hispanic Heritage month. And what, if they feel good in a similar way, that is undercutting other ethnicities? That's garbage. None of us celebrate or we all do. My kids speak the language of their family, have the traditional outfits, spend a lot of time with their family in Europe. If you have a problem with that, you are the racist.

Tell them they have good genes and get them some American eagle.

Already done. Not going to tell them that they need to live in hiding because some white people, who were not even the ethnicity as us, held slaves hundreds of years ago. Get a grip.

Ikr? And that little problem in Europe with the blue-eyed thing that was decades ago. I mean let it go already people.

Seriously. And all that birther stuff because Obama was you know.... That was so Trump's first term. Move on folks.

Why is it that we can talk about the good things of other races, but only the bad things about Europeans? That seems racist. I really don't know what you think some random Polish person had to do with American slavery. And by the numbers, black Americans have way more old white American ancestry (eg slave owner ancestry) than the average European. Yet they get a pass while people who've got nothing to do with any of this are inherently evil.

You guys really need to stop. You've lost the culture. They listened when it was reasonable but you have jumped the shark and are filled with hate.

What the heck does the Birther nonsense have to do with Europeans. That was right here in the good old USA!

Do you know where white genes come from, for the most part?

The birther thing was not about Trump's mom genes from Europe. That's not what it was about.

You're the one bringing Obama into this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs did this to themselves by putting up a stink about Sydney Sweeney. The effect of it was to make people think the left hates hot women, which is an unpopular stance. The push to make sororities, especially southern sororities, a culture war issue came immediately after the Sydney Sweeney thing. I do think it's manufactured but I also definitely think the left will take the bait.

People didn't make a stink about Sydney Sweeney, they made a stink about the normalization and glorification of eugenics. Nobody gives a f@ck about Sydney Sweeney or white sorority girls. Get a brain, and a life.

Nothing about that ad was about eugenics and you know that.

I didn't see it as eugenics. I saw it as pure sex. Seems like they always use white girls to sell pure sex.