Not talking about what OP did here, but in general, how does it help to pretend that physiological differences don’t exist between those who are born male and born female, in a test of that physiology, within which males have a clear advantage?
I do feel that what OP did was honestly kind of reactive and immature, and doesn’t really do anything to enact change, and isn’t an example of “standing up for a cause” like he thinks it is. OP just took out his general political anger/discontentq on a visible example that appeared in front of him, and the force of that was disproportionate to the recipient and event, and that’s what makes it inappropriate. |
But the point is we are talking about what OP did. I think a large majority of people think how we approach these issues should depend on context, and what is appropriate for an adult Olympic race isn’t the same as what is appropriate for a neighborhood race of 8 yos. |
Taking every single fact and claim in the light most favorable to you, and further assuming that you are completely correct about the underlying merits of the transgendered athlete issue, you were completely out of line. |
This is where I land. I disagree with OP's actions and am bothered by the impact they could have on a kid who was just trying to enjoy a fun recreational swimming experience. It's frustrating in this thread to see OP asserting over and over that his actions were justified instead of trying to at least understand that even those of us who understand where he's coming from on this issue can't endorse his behavior. But I also think these conversations would be much more productive if we could acknowledge obvious truths like: yes, there are physiological differences between girls/women and trans girls/women. And while these physiological differences don't matter in the vast majority of situations, they do matter in athletics, especially given the history of women's sports and the efforts we've had to go to as a society to ensure women have access to athletic opportunities. I can condemn OP's behavior in this situation (it was a casual rec, non-league, meet and there were lots of other ways for him to register his concerns without getting aggressive with other parents or potentially humiliating a child in a public place) while also acknowledging that I share his frustration with how crazy-making the conversation around trans girls/women in sports can be. |
Nothing to hide? Dude you are delusional. You openly admit to staring at a child’s genital area at a swim meet to determine their sex. Didn’t realize that was in the marshal job description. You admit to harassing a child by writing”boy” on the meet results and throwing a tantrum at a mini meet. You and your family should be embarrassed by your actions. The Woodley board acted appropriately in banning you from the pool. I will contact the NVSL board to let them know they need to openly state/make it clear that they follow USA swimming in allowing trans athletes to participate. They have stated this before but never made it explicit in their rules. |
Jeez, you seriously need help. 1. You cursed. You claim it could have happened but don’t think so…and someone else says it did. Their memory stands uncontroverted. 2. You wrote “boy” on the results on the sheet for all to see. 3. You criticized mom and grandma publicly. 4. You took matters into your own hands when you did not like the result of your reporting. 5. There is not even independent confirmation (not from you) as to this kid’s gender. |
+1 The OP was wrong to act as he did. Also, the physiologic differences that exist between women and trans women have implications for sports. Both things are true. Acknowledging the latter doesn’t make me or anyone else an anti-trans bigot. |
It shouldn't have been a conversation around trans girls/ women. OP decided to make it one. What if some kids are registered under the wrong age? Should marshalls now start sizing up the kids to see who is really 10 year old based on physical characteristics? As a marshall you do your job and guide your the kids. Then you shut up. If you want to be part of the board and suggest enforcement strategies for age and gender categories along with how the pool will find resources to cover these and potential lawsuits, keep queit and do your job. |
6. Gave an interview to a right wing website, risking harassment to the staff of the pool. |
I only somewhat agree. They matter in athletics in some contexts. I don't think it generally makes sense to have people born male competing with people born female after the individuals have gone through puberty when the level of competition is serious. I think it is fine at younger ages at the rec/just for fun level. |
The bolded is wild. I have no idea how OP could do what he did knowing there was a possibility, however small, that he was wrong. |
This…plus what if the child is intersex? Intersex children can be born with external male genitalia with internal female sex organs (and vice versa). Intersex kids can also have ambiguous genitalia where it is impossible to tell if the child is male or female. No one should be “scanning” children’s genital area unless they are a doctor doing a medical exam. |
I cannot imagine acting this way. For what it is worth, I was really angry when my son's soccer team allowed a girl to practice with his MLS Next team. The reason is that it is a team for boys, and the team was already oversubscribed such that some male players could not be rostered for each game. It seemed very unfair. However, I cannot imagine harassing the young lady or embarrassing her in the way you did this swimmer. Your behavior was inappropriate. |
Luis,
You aren’t wrong in principle but it was inappropriate of you to bring it up during a meet. Just as when I am a timer it is not my job to judge stroke and turns. |
Hopefully they hold him accountable for continuing his public hysterics even now. Kick him out. |