Cell phone tower near home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a rational explanation of the current state of affairs.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

The ACS isn't trying to sell you anything, so I trust them to be more impartial.

ACS takes money from the mobile phone companies. Obviously this is what they would say.

As soon as someone breaks away from the influence of money, you see them making rational decisions. Example: RFK Jr making the long overdue decision to keep phones out of school to limit our kids exposure to harmful EMF radiation. It’s a no brainer.

Didn't you hear? Horse dewormer cures non-ionizing radiation toxicity. And raw milk turns it into fresh smelling farts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is your take on a cell phone tower near a residence?
Would you be worried and still buy the property?
I have found some information by researching on the internet, but somehow the towers have gone up all over the county without any input from the residents

Dealbreaker.
With the advent of 5G which has much less range than 4G, the number of new transmission towers has skyrocketed, as they need like 20 times more towers.

Many are kinda hidden now in trees, behind signs, fake trees, water towers, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With 5G there are cell phone towers everywhere. Look it up on the FCC site

This.
It's odd, it seemed to make no sense to use 5G when 4G has a much greater range, reliability, and requires a fraction of the number of towers.
Really got the conspiracy folks worked up with all that.

Yeah would like to hear some valid answers for that, other than just requiring everyone to buy new phones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a rational explanation of the current state of affairs.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

The ACS isn't trying to sell you anything, so I trust them to be more impartial.

ACS takes money from the mobile phone companies. Obviously this is what they would say.

As soon as someone breaks away from the influence of money, you see them making rational decisions. Example: RFK Jr making the long overdue decision to keep phones out of school to limit our kids exposure to harmful EMF radiation. It’s a no brainer.

LOL was waiting for the RFK reference.

If you’re into essential oils, MLMs, and would rather get polio than a polio vaccine, you might be afraid of cell phone towers.

If you are an educated professional who was avoiding food dyes before RFK was a thing, you’ll be happy to live near a tower because you’ll get better reception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a rational explanation of the current state of affairs.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

The ACS isn't trying to sell you anything, so I trust them to be more impartial.

ACS takes money from the mobile phone companies. Obviously this is what they would say.

As soon as someone breaks away from the influence of money, you see them making rational decisions. Example: RFK Jr making the long overdue decision to keep phones out of school to limit our kids exposure to harmful EMF radiation. It’s a no brainer.

LOL was waiting for the RFK reference.

If you’re into essential oils, MLMs, and would rather get polio than a polio vaccine, you might be afraid of cell phone towers.

If you are an educated professional who was avoiding food dyes before RFK was a thing, you’ll be happy to live near a tower because you’ll get better reception.

Don't confuse indoctrination with education.

Also neither have anything to do with intelligence anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is your take on a cell phone tower near a residence?
Would you be worried and still buy the property?
I have found some information by researching on the internet, but somehow the towers have gone up all over the county without any input from the residents

Chill out!
Your Wi-Fi signal at home is more harmful than cell phone towers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a rational explanation of the current state of affairs.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

The ACS isn't trying to sell you anything, so I trust them to be more impartial.

ACS takes money from the mobile phone companies. Obviously this is what they would say.

As soon as someone breaks away from the influence of money, you see them making rational decisions. Example: RFK Jr making the long overdue decision to keep phones out of school to limit our kids exposure to harmful EMF radiation. It’s a no brainer.

You meant to say that you don't have a brain.

[Anonymous]

It’s the same as being near data centers which are all over the place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is your take on a cell phone tower near a residence?
Would you be worried and still buy the property?
I have found some information by researching on the internet, but somehow the towers have gone up all over the county without any input from the residents

I would not buy that property. Good luck! It is going to lower your house value if they are putting one up.

[Anonymous]

You would never survive in NYC then. There are cell antennas on every building. You are walking around and getting off the charts RF readings everywhere. Yet, people are somehow not dropping dead and don’t even look sickly over there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s the same as being near data centers which are all over the place.

All over the place where? They aren’t going to put data centers on $$$$ land in premium urban centers and in the midst of denser suburbia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a rational explanation of the current state of affairs.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

The ACS isn't trying to sell you anything, so I trust them to be more impartial.

ACS takes money from the mobile phone companies. Obviously this is what they would say.

As soon as someone breaks away from the influence of money, you see them making rational decisions. Example: RFK Jr making the long overdue decision to keep phones out of school to limit our kids exposure to harmful EMF radiation. It’s a no brainer.

LOL was waiting for the RFK reference.

If you’re into essential oils, MLMs, and would rather get polio than a polio vaccine, you might be afraid of cell phone towers.

If you are an educated professional who was avoiding food dyes before RFK was a thing, you’ll be happy to live near a tower because you’ll get better reception.

Nobody in their right mind would be happy to live near cell towers, you are way overplaying this. Even if there isn’t any proven harm from them long term people still avoid living near one and it becomes undesirable for resale alone. You just will never have the same premium other houses would have in the same area if you are in the shadow of a cell towers regardless what you believe.

It’s different in dense urban areas where antennas are on top of buildings and impossible to avoid. People simply have no choice and nobody pays attention to it when it comes to property values. But in places where there is a choice to find a house not close to a cell tower staring you in the face, most people would prefer not to live so near one or would only live near one if there is a discount.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a rational explanation of the current state of affairs.

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/radiation-exposure/cellular-phone-towers.html

The ACS isn't trying to sell you anything, so I trust them to be more impartial.

ACS takes money from the mobile phone companies. Obviously this is what they would say.

As soon as someone breaks away from the influence of money, you see them making rational decisions. Example: RFK Jr making the long overdue decision to keep phones out of school to limit our kids exposure to harmful EMF radiation. It’s a no brainer.

you are the worst kind of stupid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is your take on a cell phone tower near a residence?
Would you be worried and still buy the property?
I have found some information by researching on the internet, but somehow the towers have gone up all over the county without any input from the residents

Dealbreaker.
With the advent of 5G which has much less range than 4G, the number of new transmission towers has skyrocketed, as they need like 20 times more towers.

Many are kinda hidden now in trees, behind signs, fake trees, water towers, etc.

Only for the millimeter wave 5G. The upside is that those mcrocells have less power and the RF has less penetration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is your take on a cell phone tower near a residence?
Would you be worried and still buy the property?
I have found some information by researching on the internet, but somehow the towers have gone up all over the county without any input from the residents

Dealbreaker.
With the advent of 5G which has much less range than 4G, the number of new transmission towers has skyrocketed, as they need like 20 times more towers.

Many are kinda hidden now in trees, behind signs, fake trees, water towers, etc.

Only for the millimeter wave 5G. The upside is that those mcrocells have less power and the RF has less penetration.

So my tinfoil hat will work against mmw 5G?