I’m 5’8”, 149, and mostly size 12. So if you’re not overweight, neither am I. |
|
Originally it meant size 10-12 in reference to the models. Most of them are around size 4-6, plus sized are 14+, so in the middle are the midsized ones. Keep in mind that the models are pretty tall, so 10-12 looks more like 6-8 proportions wise on an average height woman.
Now, on social media it can mean anything. |
You are definitely not overweight! Our proportions must be quite different or maybe I buy more clothing that uses vanity sizing
I carry all my weight in my hips/thighs/butt, flat stomach with big boobs and wide shoulders. |
| I’m a 2-4 now but I used to be an 8-10. Same size. I consider myself midsize. 16 is plus size. |
I’m 5’10” and have been all of those sizes, and I mostly agree with you. At size 8, I could wear anything I wanted without regard for how it was cut, etc. There were no body parts to “work around.” At size 10, I had to try things on and make sure the size was correct, but most things worked. Size 12 is getting closer to true “midsized.” I’m now at 14 and need to google up some of those midsized influencers, because now fashion is a struggle. |
It isn't. This is the result of marketing. If women (fwiw like me) who are a size 14 consider themselves "mid" instead of "plus" ... they feel better and buy more stuff. And, perhaps more importantly, influencer marketing in this area will be more effective if women can consume it and not hear the word "plus." Also, as a practical matter, at this point given the epidemic of overweight/obesity in America, a 14 probably is about the average size, so I can see where calling it "plus" would gradually fade away. |
Yeah, her waist was like 24". She was curvy, but also tiny. |
No. A size 10 is "plus size" if you are talking about models. -- a model |
| Size zero is ideal size, size 4 is mid and above 6 is plus |
Well, she was 55 so that makes sense. If she was 511 her waist would not have been 24 inches. |
Yes, that was true. 10 years ago. That was the last time you modeled |
|
I used to work at Altar'd State. We had very little that would fit a size 10, and virtually nothing that would fit a 12. We had xs (00) s(0 to 2), m (4 to 6) and l (8 to maybe a 10). We carried virtually no xl. If you wore a 10, you might fit into an l swearer but not an l dress that zipped, if that makes sense.
Yes, these clothes are marketed at juniors/teenagers. But plenty of grown women shopped there. I think of mid-size as the normal adult sizes that were larger than we carried there. The sizes you could get at Ann Taylor next door that weren't plus. I'll add that I think the definition of "plus" has been pushed for sure. I have always thought of a 14 as plus. Some folks on here are saying it starts at more of a 16 or even 18. |
Which was a lot more recently than you did. |
Same. I buy a lot of kid’s clothes |
| I don’t think it’s a specific size, but a ratio or general look. Tiny and thin like Kendall Jenner was the original size model. Plus size is like Ashley Graham (she is gorgeous, btw). And midsize is anyone in between, which is most people. |