U.S. build up to Iranian invasion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys crazy this is not going to work in our favor. The rest of the world no longer trusts the US as a reliable ally and we will get no support from Europe. The Middle East will hate us even more they already do and this will push the rest of the world towards China and Russia. Invading Iran will basically guarantee that China is the global superpower of the 21st century.

After today’s conference, China is now the global superpower. We are effed. He said our friends were raping America. He literally said that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is very mountainous plus urban areas. The US would have to commit a majority of the military plus reserve.

But why do it? The only reason is Israel wants it done.

There you have your answer, these are Israel’s wars, basically we are going to slaughter our boys for Israel.

Sadly for you, who sees everything through an anti-Israel lens, the U.S. is clearsighted when it comes to identifying threats to global stability. Iran is pushing themselves closer to the top of the list through not only their continued sponsorship of Palestinian terror groups, but with their nuclear ambitions which, if realized, could threaten more than their immediate neighbors. A new stone age for them seems like a worthy goal.

Seems like you only see things through the rose colored glasses of Israel. Israel has invade 4 countries in the past year and destabilize the whole Middle East. They have continuallyassassinated and bombed other countries and embassies. The threat to global stability is Israel.

Only terror sympathizers mourn the deaths of terrorists you seem sad to see gone.

Funny, the ME seems pretty quiet at the moment. Hezbollah has been neutered, Hamas is a pitiful shell of what they had been, Syria swapped one rotten regime for what will probably be another, so a wash there. Israel now faces no substantial threats from Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, or the West Bank and is taking steps to keep things like that. Jordan and Egypt want nothing to do with the Palestinians and are staying on their sides of their borders. Seems like keeping Iran from nuclear capability, given their support for terrorists, is the next logical step towards peace and stability.

^ state-sponsored terrorism expert, AKA Israel First propaganda goon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Iran is providing weapons to Russia. Why shouldn't America invade?

Russia is now an ally or senior partner with Trump. Putin will be upset if Trump does something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is very mountainous plus urban areas. The US would have to commit a majority of the military plus reserve.

But why do it? The only reason is Israel wants it done.

There you have your answer, these are Israel’s wars, basically we are going to slaughter our boys for Israel.

Sadly for you, who sees everything through an anti-Israel lens, the U.S. is clearsighted when it comes to identifying threats to global stability. Iran is pushing themselves closer to the top of the list through not only their continued sponsorship of Palestinian terror groups, but with their nuclear ambitions which, if realized, could threaten more than their immediate neighbors. A new stone age for them seems like a worthy goal.

Seems like you only see things through the rose colored glasses of Israel. Israel has invade 4 countries in the past year and destabilize the whole Middle East. They have continuallyassassinated and bombed other countries and embassies. The threat to global stability is Israel.

Only terror sympathizers mourn the deaths of terrorists you seem sad to see gone.

Funny, the ME seems pretty quiet at the moment. Hezbollah has been neutered, Hamas is a pitiful shell of what they had been, Syria swapped one rotten regime for what will probably be another, so a wash there. Israel now faces no substantial threats from Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, or the West Bank and is taking steps to keep things like that. Jordan and Egypt want nothing to do with the Palestinians and are staying on their sides of their borders. Seems like keeping Iran from nuclear capability, given their support for terrorists, is the next logical step towards peace and stability.

Interesting…when will you freeloads pay the US back?

[Anonymous]

How does it feel to be the poster child for welfare fraud, Israel?

Keep hearing the blather about deserts blooming, but all me and DOGE are seeing is a waste of space welfare junkie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is providing weapons to Russia. Why shouldn't America invade?

The world, including the U.S., will be better off with a regime change in Iran, or at least with Iran rendered impotent in terms of nuclear weapons. We live in this world, so it is our circus unless you prefer to close your eyes and just hope Iran will be magnanimous and exempt U.S. interests from their future targeting after they acquire nuclear weapons, a prospect so unlikely as to be laughable. That a weak and ineffectual Iran would also benefit Israel is incidental, if salutary.

While I agree in theory, I have a question: What did we do to help Iranian youth when they struggled against their regime a few years ago?

Nothing? That's what I thought.

So again, if ya want to send your daughters and sons to fight yet another war in the Middle East, go right ahead. Nobody is stopping ya. Good luck solving the Middle Eastern problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought we were invading Greenland? Two front war?

I am sure Denmark will participate in the coalition of the willing on both fronts.

Not now.

Not when we are talking about taking Greenland.

Dont worry we can still count on Canada /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys crazy this is not going to work in our favor. The rest of the world no longer trusts the US as a reliable ally and we will get no support from Europe. The Middle East will hate us even more they already do and this will push the rest of the world towards China and Russia. Invading Iran will basically guarantee that China is the global superpower of the 21st century.

After today’s conference, China is now the global superpower. We are effed. He said our friends were raping America. He literally said that.

But but but Brian from Detroit is so happy now that plants are reopening right and left in the US and the golden era of US manufacturing is starting /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is very mountainous plus urban areas. The US would have to commit a majority of the military plus reserve.

But why do it? The only reason is Israel wants it done.

There you have your answer, these are Israel’s wars, basically we are going to slaughter our boys for Israel.

Sadly for you, who sees everything through an anti-Israel lens, the U.S. is clearsighted when it comes to identifying threats to global stability. Iran is pushing themselves closer to the top of the list through not only their continued sponsorship of Palestinian terror groups, but with their nuclear ambitions which, if realized, could threaten more than their immediate neighbors. A new stone age for them seems like a worthy goal.

Seems like you only see things through the rose colored glasses of Israel. Israel has invade 4 countries in the past year and destabilize the whole Middle East. They have continuallyassassinated and bombed other countries and embassies. The threat to global stability is Israel.

Only terror sympathizers mourn the deaths of terrorists you seem sad to see gone.

Funny, the ME seems pretty quiet at the moment. Hezbollah has been neutered, Hamas is a pitiful shell of what they had been, Syria swapped one rotten regime for what will probably be another, so a wash there. Israel now faces no substantial threats from Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, or the West Bank and is taking steps to keep things like that. Jordan and Egypt want nothing to do with the Palestinians and are staying on their sides of their borders. Seems like keeping Iran from nuclear capability, given their support for terrorists, is the next logical step towards peace and stability.

Not our circus not our monkeys.

Feel free to send your daughters, sons, nieces and nephews to fight if you wish.

That's what I want to know - who is going to fight this war?

I think the protests over the Iraq war will look like child's play compared to this. No one voted for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is providing weapons to Russia. Why shouldn't America invade?

The world, including the U.S., will be better off with a regime change in Iran, or at least with Iran rendered impotent in terms of nuclear weapons. We live in this world, so it is our circus unless you prefer to close your eyes and just hope Iran will be magnanimous and exempt U.S. interests from their future targeting after they acquire nuclear weapons, a prospect so unlikely as to be laughable. That a weak and ineffectual Iran would also benefit Israel is incidental, if salutary.

Yes. duh. That's why we negotiated a multi-lateral treaty back in the 2010's, which seemed to actually be working until this country lost its mind.

As for regime change in Iran - how exactly do you think we got here my friend?

[Anonymous]

Iran is not the problem. Israel is. It is time to stop trying to change the world for Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is providing weapons to Russia. Why shouldn't America invade?

The world, including the U.S., will be better off with a regime change in Iran, or at least with Iran rendered impotent in terms of nuclear weapons. We live in this world, so it is our circus unless you prefer to close your eyes and just hope Iran will be magnanimous and exempt U.S. interests from their future targeting after they acquire nuclear weapons, a prospect so unlikely as to be laughable. That a weak and ineffectual Iran would also benefit Israel is incidental, if salutary.

Yes. duh. That's why we negotiated a multi-lateral treaty back in the 2010's, which seemed to actually be working until this country lost its mind.

As for regime change in Iran - how exactly do you think we got here my friend?

Exactly. Unfortunately, the radical, extremist Zionists (not just the segment of the Israeli population that cannot find peaceful coexistence with anyone, but also the racist, dumb AF douchebags supporting this madness here in the U.S. and the corrupt POS political class in DC doing Israel’s bidding) don’t have the bandwidth to bother with history.

Who needs to understand actual history when you can just make shit up?!

That should be the subtitle of every book written about the MAGA movement …

[Anonymous]

Iran's leader said Iran could launch a nuke at Israel and it wouldn't matter if Israel retaliated with nukes, because it would only destroy a small part of the Muslim world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran is providing weapons to Russia. Why shouldn't America invade?

The world, including the U.S., will be better off with a regime change in Iran, or at least with Iran rendered impotent in terms of nuclear weapons. We live in this world, so it is our circus unless you prefer to close your eyes and just hope Iran will be magnanimous and exempt U.S. interests from their future targeting after they acquire nuclear weapons, a prospect so unlikely as to be laughable. That a weak and ineffectual Iran would also benefit Israel is incidental, if salutary.

Yes. duh. That's why we negotiated a multi-lateral treaty back in the 2010's, which seemed to actually be working until this country lost its mind.

As for regime change in Iran - how exactly do you think we got here my friend?

This treaty allowed Iran to develop nuclear weapons while ostensibly preventing it.
The key detail is Iran had to process uranium, and this takes a long time.
So Iran under the deal would not process uranium, but could use this equipment to process other chemicals.
The problem is by doing this, Iran could develop better and better centrifuges.
These better centrifuges make the time to process uranium drop by many years.
So Iran goes from needing 50 years to process enough uranium, to developing its centrifuges over a 10-15 year timeframe, at the end of which it would only take months to develop uranium for a nuke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Iran's leader said Iran could launch a nuke at Israel and it wouldn't matter if Israel retaliated with nukes, because it would only destroy a small part of the Muslim world.

Just keep making shit up.

(Nobody believes you. The gig is up.)