Susie Wiles was supposed to be the adult in the room

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The way she manages Trump is by not trying. She just lets him do him while she focuses on specific things. The challenge is that the stakes are significantly different than just running a campaign.

So what is she focusing on? The gold trim in the Oval?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have wondered about this too. Maybe absolutely no one can manage Trump. He went through several chiefs of staff in his first administration.

Oh please! She’s all in on this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?

You're smoking crack if you think the party of trans ideology is winning anything in 2028.

That dog is not going to hunt in 2026 or 2028. The Dems will do much better in those elections.

Stay tuned. It's hard to believe you're all so stupid and lost as to not realize how defending the "right" of mentally ill children to be sterilized and the "right" of fetishistic male sex offenders to expose their genitals to women has killed your credibility.

And you keep on creating attack ads for Republicans to dunk on you with. Look at this unanimous vote against keeping scrotes out of women's sports over the objections of 80% of the country. Who do you think you're winning over in 2028 with this kind of track record?

Literally millions of voters. We are losing our strong economy and we are losing our national security. Gop popularity is dropping like a rock as it should.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?

You're smoking crack if you think the party of trans ideology is winning anything in 2028.

That dog is not going to hunt in 2026 or 2028. The Dems will do much better in those elections.

Stay tuned. It's hard to believe you're all so stupid and lost as to not realize how defending the "right" of mentally ill children to be sterilized and the "right" of fetishistic male sex offenders to expose their genitals to women has killed your credibility.

And you keep on creating attack ads for Republicans to dunk on you with. Look at this unanimous vote against keeping scrotes out of women's sports over the objections of 80% of the country. Who do you think you're winning over in 2028 with this kind of track record?

Literally millions of voters. We are losing our strong economy and we are losing our national security. Gop popularity is dropping like a rock as it should.

Right. And there's precedent for this. Why, in 2024, Democrats' far-left insanity on social issues didn't stop them from capitalizing on the right to abortion, the danger of project 2025, Jan. 6, Ukraine, the economy, and major Republican figures coming out against Trump. I mean they swept the presidency, senate, house, and all 7 swing states . . . oh, wait.

Well, we all know last time was an anomaly. Next time, next time victory is imminent. Onward, sister!

Right. The GOP ran the trans ads and made it an issue. It's a false narrative, but you clearly have no problem in perpetuating it.

The GOP spent FAR more time and energy talking about trans issues than anyone on the left did. And they accused everyone on the left of campaigning on trans stuff even when they didn't say or do a single thing on trans issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?

You're smoking crack if you think the party of trans ideology is winning anything in 2028.

That dog is not going to hunt in 2026 or 2028. The Dems will do much better in those elections.

Stay tuned. It's hard to believe you're all so stupid and lost as to not realize how defending the "right" of mentally ill children to be sterilized and the "right" of fetishistic male sex offenders to expose their genitals to women has killed your credibility.

And you keep on creating attack ads for Republicans to dunk on you with. Look at this unanimous vote against keeping scrotes out of women's sports over the objections of 80% of the country. Who do you think you're winning over in 2028 with this kind of track record?

Literally millions of voters. We are losing our strong economy and we are losing our national security. Gop popularity is dropping like a rock as it should.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t decide whether I’m mad at Trump for laying off federal employees, or happy he did it because it has turned the public against him. Now Democrats will win in 2026 and 2028 and we can hire everyone back and get the USAID programs back on track. So, fine. But still, was all this turmoil really necessary?

You're smoking crack if you think the party of trans ideology is winning anything in 2028.

That dog is not going to hunt in 2026 or 2028. The Dems will do much better in those elections.

Stay tuned. It's hard to believe you're all so stupid and lost as to not realize how defending the "right" of mentally ill children to be sterilized and the "right" of fetishistic male sex offenders to expose their genitals to women has killed your credibility.

And you keep on creating attack ads for Republicans to dunk on you with. Look at this unanimous vote against keeping scrotes out of women's sports over the objections of 80% of the country. Who do you think you're winning over in 2028 with this kind of track record?

Literally millions of voters. We are losing our strong economy and we are losing our national security. Gop popularity is dropping like a rock as it should.

Right. And there's precedent for this. Why, in 2024, Democrats' far-left insanity on social issues didn't stop them from capitalizing on the right to abortion, the danger of project 2025, Jan. 6, Ukraine, the economy, and major Republican figures coming out against Trump. I mean they swept the presidency, senate, house, and all 7 swing states . . . oh, wait.

Well, we all know last time was an anomaly. Next time, next time victory is imminent. Onward, sister!

Right. The GOP ran the trans ads and made it an issue. It's a false narrative, but you clearly have no problem in perpetuating it.

The GOP spent FAR more time and energy talking about trans issues than anyone on the left did. And they accused everyone on the left of campaigning on trans stuff even when they didn't say or do a single thing on trans issues.

Never underestimate the ignorance and stupidity of the American electorate. George Smathers who was a US Senator from Florida won his Senate seat with the speech below!

"Part of American political lore is the Smathers "redneck speech", which Smathers reportedly delivered to a poorly educated audience. The comments were recorded in a small magazine, picked up in Time and elsewhere, and etched into the public's memories.[39] Time, during the campaign, reported a "yarn" that Smathers had said:

"Are you aware that Claude Pepper is known all over Washington as a shameless extrovert? Not only that, but this man is reliably reported to practice nepotism with his sister-in-law, he has a brother who is a known homo sapiens, and he has a sister who was once a thespian in wicked New York. Worst of all, it is an established fact that Mr. Pepper, before his marriage, habitually practiced celibacy."

" The leading reporter who actually covered Smathers said he always gave the same humdrum speech. No Florida newspapers covering the campaign ever reported such remarks contemporaneously. Smathers offered $10,000 to anyone who could prove he said it, and there were no takers before his death."

[Anonymous]

Why has anyone ever thought anything positive about her? That seems absurd, counterfactual and naive.she helped get him elected, she is fine with all of this. She got a fancy title for her efforts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That was the lie we were told when she was named.

+1 She's got a mediocre CV and has been borderline invisible. She'll sit quietly and collect her salary or quit in a year and get more $$ monetizing her connections to the Trump admin. Just like the rest of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That was the lie we were told when she was named.

+1 She's got a mediocre CV and has been borderline invisible. She'll sit quietly and collect her salary or quit in a year and get more $$ monetizing her connections to the Trump admin. Just like the rest of them.

She had to sign a NDA.

[Anonymous]

Susie Wiles is so invisible that someone has taken over her role for her and the FBI is investigating. This administration’s IT security continues to be… less than ideal.

Federal Authorities Probe Effort to Impersonate White House Chief of Staff
https://apple.news/AqI0gef76TZK-VmxKZOcWuA