Are we talking about Trump's vendetta against Covington and Perkins Coie

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just because he doesn't like who they represent? Rule of law breaking down right before our eyes.


Nope. Democrats weaponized the legal system against Trump. Now both Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie staff will lose their security clearances.

Time to defang the democrat machine.


Either this is trolling/sarcasm or...

The cognitive dissonance I see lately by MAGA is just astonishing.


They don’t have a clue. It’s a cult.
Anonymous
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:


Section 1. Purpose. The dishonest and dangerous activity of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP (“Perkins Coie”) has affected this country for decades. Notably, in 2016 while representing failed Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Perkins Coie hired Fusion GPS, which then manufactured a false “dossier” designed to steal an election. This egregious activity is part of a pattern. Perkins Coie has worked with activist donors including George Soros to judicially overturn popular, necessary, and democratically enacted election laws, including those requiring voter identification. In one such case, a court was forced to sanction Perkins Coie attorneys for an unethical lack of candor before the court.


In addition to undermining democratic elections, the integrity of our courts, and honest law enforcement, Perkins Coie racially discriminates against its own attorneys and staff, and against applicants. Perkins Coie publicly announced percentage quotas in 2019 for hiring and promotion on the basis of race and other categories prohibited by civil rights laws. It proudly excluded applicants on the basis of race for its fellowships, and it maintained these discriminatory practices until applicants harmed by them finally sued to enforce change.


My Administration is committed to ending discrimination under “diversity, equity, and inclusion” policies and ensuring that Federal benefits support the laws and policies of the United States, including those laws and policies promoting our national security and respecting the democratic process. Those who engage in blatant race-based and sex-based discrimination, including quotas, but purposefully hide the nature of such discrimination through deceiving language, have engaged in a serious violation of the public trust. Their disrespect for the bedrock principle of equality represents good cause to conclude that they neither have access to our Nation’s secrets nor be deemed responsible stewards of any Federal funds.


Sec. 2. Security Clearance Review. (a) The Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and all other relevant heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall immediately take steps consistent with applicable law to suspend any active security clearances held by individuals at Perkins Coie, pending a review of whether such clearances are consistent with the national interest.


(b) The Office of Management and Budget shall identify all Government goods, property, material, and services, including Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities, provided for the benefit of Perkins Coie. The heads of all agencies providing such material or services shall, to the extent permitted by law, expeditiously cease such provision.


Sec. 3. Contracting. (a) To prevent the transfer of taxpayer dollars to Federal contractors whose earnings subsidize, among other things, racial discrimination, falsified documents designed to weaponize the Government against candidates for office, and anti-democratic election changes that invite fraud and distrust, Government contracting agencies shall, to the extent permissible by law, require Government contractors to disclose any business they do with Perkins Coie and whether that business is related to the subject of the Government contract.


(b) The heads of all agencies shall review all contracts with Perkins Coie or with entities that disclose doing business with Perkins Coie under subsection (a) of this section. To the extent permitted by law, the heads of agencies shall:


(i) take appropriate steps to terminate any contract, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation, for which Perkins Coie has been hired to perform any service;


(ii) otherwise align their agency funding decisions with the interests of the citizens of the United States; with the goals and priorities of my Administration as expressed in executive actions, especially Executive Order 14147 of January 20, 2025 (Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government); and as heads of agencies deem appropriate. Within 30 days of the date of this order, all agencies shall submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget an assessment of contracts with Perkins Coie or with entities that do business with Perkins Coie effective as of the date of this order and any actions taken with respect to those contracts in accordance with this order.


Sec. 4. Racial Discrimination. (a) The Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall review the practices of representative large, influential, or industry leading law firms for consistency with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including whether large law firms: reserve certain positions, such as summer associate spots, for individuals of preferred races; promote individuals on a discriminatory basis; permit client access on a discriminatory basis; or provide access to events, trainings, or travel on a discriminatory basis.


(b) The Attorney General, in coordination with the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and in consultation with State Attorneys General as appropriate, shall investigate the practices of large law firms as described in subsection (a) of this section who do business with Federal entities for compliance with race-based and sex-based non-discrimination laws and take any additional actions the Attorney General deems appropriate in light of the evidence uncovered.

Sec. 5. Personnel. (a) The heads of all agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, provide guidance limiting official access from Federal Government buildings to employees of Perkins Coie when such access would threaten the national security of or otherwise be inconsistent with the interests of the United States. In addition, the heads of all agencies shall provide guidance limiting Government employees acting in their official capacity from engaging with Perkins Coie employees to ensure consistency with the national security and other interests of the United States.


(b) Agency officials shall, to the extent permitted by law, refrain from hiring employees of Perkins Coie, absent a waiver from the head of the agency, made in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, that such hire will not threaten the national security of the United States.


Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:


(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or


(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.


(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.


(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 6, 2025.
Anonymous
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE
THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY
THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
THE DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT

SUBJECT: Suspension of Security Clearances and Evaluation
of Government Contracts

I hereby direct the Attorney General and all other relevant heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) to immediately take steps consistent with applicable law to suspend any active security clearances held by Peter Koski and all members, partners, and employees of Covington & Burling LLP who assisted former Special Counsel Jack Smith during his time as Special Counsel, pending a review and determination of their roles and responsibilities, if any, in the weaponization of the judicial process. I also direct the Attorney General and heads of agencies to take such actions as are necessary to terminate any engagement of Covington & Burling LLP by any agency to the maximum extent permitted by law and consistent with the memorandum that shall be issued by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

Additionally, if any of the covered Covington & Burling LLP members, partners, and employees referenced in this memorandum obtained a security clearance from an agency not included as an addressee of this memorandum, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall provide this memorandum to the appropriate clearance-granting agency to ensure compliance.

I further direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to issue a memorandum to all agencies to review all Government contracts with Covington & Burling LLP. To the extent permitted by applicable law, heads of agencies shall align their agency funding decisions with the interests of the citizens of the United States; with the goals and priorities of my Administration as expressed in executive actions, especially Executive Order 14147 of January 20, 2025 (Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government); and as heads of agencies deem appropriate.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Anonymous
Such a petty, vindictive, small man. Note that there is no accusation of violating a specific law, just a lot of "these guys were mean to me".
Anonymous
Good for Trump, they have it coming. FAFO
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just because he doesn't like who they represent? Rule of law breaking down right before our eyes.


Won't someone please think of the poor, Big Law millionaire lawyers and their plight? lmao


We are thinking of the rights of all citizens.
Anonymous
Why does Perkins Coie need a SCIF?
Anonymous
The vendetta is gross. I've worked extensively with Perkins Coie and they are an amazing group of talented and ethical lawyers. Their innovations including DEI efforts were a model for other top firms.

Trump is a small, petty man.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They are over in the jobs forum. Interim US attorney for DC is also threatening law schools and saying they won't hire any grad from a school that teaches any sort of "DEI" in its curriculum. (Which is...pretty much all law schools, given how amorphous "DEI" is.) Not only is this very clearly illegal, it's also just a disgrace.


There is no right or law guaranteeing a job offer. It is apparent that democrats are not used to being told no.


There is a right to not be retaliated against by the government because of your speech or political views. It's in the first amendment.

That didn't stop Biden from going after Elon.
'
How and when exactly did Biden go after Musk?

SEC investigations.
USAID investigating Starlink, even while they were the ones providing service to Ukraine, that DOD was not willing to reimburse.
SpaceX faced DOJ prosecution that they were not hiring non-citizens, specifically parolees.
Musk's Tesla compensation package from a few years ago was revoked.



Wasn’t NTSB looking into the window problem when folks were burning alive in Teslas too?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why does Perkins Coie need a SCIF?


Where else are you going to read classified documents and have classified discussions? Companies can build a SCIF. I know someone who had a SCIF in his basement of his house.
Anonymous
Everything Trump does is illegal, unconstitutional, and corrupt.
Anonymous
Perkins has hired Williams and Connolly. Too bad the new and improved DoJ has no one qualified to work in the WC mail room. Should be fun.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why does Perkins Coie need a SCIF?


Many big law firms need a SCIF, for dealing with sensitive matters.
Anonymous
Look no law firm will stand against the government. The lawyers at these firm will follow in line with Trump just like SCOTUS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Look no law firm will stand against the government. The lawyers at these firm will follow in line with Trump just like SCOTUS.


Babe, you are late to the party.
Bimbo Bondi and her band of B team buffoons are not going to last 5 min in front of a judge and especially against Williams and Connolly
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: