What news out,ets are considered unbiased, particularly curious to hear from MAGA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AP and BBC


X is a total $hit show of bots, trolls, and disinformation. Americans have proven they are not smart enough to sort through it for real news. Plus, no one should be supporting Musk. Get off X.

Agree. X is an absolute shtshow. It’s propaganda drivel.

What isn't? It's a lot of stuff, a melting pot of opinions if you can create a feed and follow accounts to bring you diff POVs and learn to filter BS and bots. Anonymous small accounts are not all bots and often have useful insightful info in the replies. In other words, don't just read the stuff posted by big accounts (monetized) but read the replies and replies to the interesting replies to create a list of accounts to follow with varied opinions and interesting perspectives. Often there is confrontation in the replies. And yeah, you will see a lot of crazy sh**, so be prepared. I haven't tried Blusky or Truth Social but I think they lean more bias and my time is limited

Sorry but I actually do want hateful things moderated. I also don't care about the replies because there is so much astroturfing, it's a waste of time. You enjoy reading troll/astroturf accounts and bots? They can seem legit and even have a supposed legitimate seeming account in the same name on another platform. I got introduced to this by seeing how dropshippers game fake reviews.

[Anonymous]

Pretty much nothing is unbiased. BBC and AP news are perhaps the closest, but they still lean left, and you really need to read several sources across political lines to find out what’s actually happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pretty much nothing is unbiased. BBC and AP news are perhaps the closest, but they still lean left, and you really need to read several sources across political lines to find out what’s actually happening.

Lean left of what? Nothing is unbiased, and the “center” does not exist. Never has.

[Anonymous]

What is needed are critical thinking and analysis skills by the end user. The media, no matter which platform you speak of, presents facts interspersed with opinion, and sometimes framed in ways which are calculated to elicit sympathy or outrage. Consumers have to distinguish the facts reported from the rest of it, to come to their own conclusions about the meaning and implications of the actual facts.

[Anonymous]

I find that US media is often too close to what's going on to be well reasoned and objective. For more dispassionate and objective news I turn to the Financial Times and The Economist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AP and BBC


X is a total $hit show of bots, trolls, and disinformation. Americans have proven they are not smart enough to sort through it for real news. Plus, no one should be supporting Musk. Get off X.

DH is a Brit and said BBC news tries really hard to stay neutral. His parents were conservatives, but he is more of a moderate liberal (I'm a moderate R).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. I am a moderate, pro-labor Democrat who knew Trump was going to win months ago, just to lay out my political leanings. I do not believe there are any unbiased or even trustworthy news sources. I consume a very wide array of media sources and reach conclusions from that. And I mean very, very wide: like Daily Wire on one end, Mother Jones on the other.

I 100% do not trust mainstream media like NYT, WaPo, BBC, etc.

makes no sense to me. You don't trust BBC and AP but you do Mother Jones, as if MJ is not biased or has stellar reporting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t some sort of fact checking function be necessary to qualify as a ‘news source’? If a site simply allows the posting of opinions then that serves a purpose but doesn’t qualify as news.

We need some kind of non-partisan professional ethics board. Because right now anyone can call themselves a journalist, get a website, and spout whatever BS they want. There needs to be a clear difference between news and fictional entertainment because it’s causing real harm.

haha.. good luck with that from the Trump admin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please provide unbiased news sources? What would you consider to be a simple reporting of facts?

There is no unbiased new source.

[Anonymous]

There is no such thing as unbiased, but there are degrees to it.

[Anonymous]

I'm not MAGA, but I find ground.news useful.

[Anonymous]

AP. It's a wire service so they need to stay as unbiased as they possibly can.

I also read WSJ and Bloomberg. One leans right and one leans left but they are not extreme.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. I am a moderate, pro-labor Democrat who knew Trump was going to win months ago, just to lay out my political leanings. I do not believe there are any unbiased or even trustworthy news sources. I consume a very wide array of media sources and reach conclusions from that. And I mean very, very wide: like Daily Wire on one end, Mother Jones on the other.

I 100% do not trust mainstream media like NYT, WaPo, BBC, etc.

You are NOT.
Your statement is contradiction.

[Anonymous]

AP is the safe bet.
X is nauseating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please provide unbiased news sources? What would you consider to be a simple reporting of facts?

Tangle