Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There will also be new middle school and high school boundary lines/assignments starting in 2027 (your daughter's 6th grade year), by the way. So I wouldn't make any huge sacrifices for a given school because you never know if it will actually be the one she'll be assigned to by the time it's time for her to attend.
In Silver Spring?
Yes, all the DCC high schools and their feeder middle schools are included in the Woodward boundary study, as is BCC, which covers part of Silver Spring.
Only the tiniest slivers of downtown Silver Spring goes to BCC. It was a historically black neighborhood and low income apartments gerrymandered into BCC’s zone to integrate it to the point Bethesda successfully lobbied the central office to close rosemary hills in the early 80s when the county was closing schools from the population shrinkage. They only acquiesced when the feds threatened to pull county funding. Funny part is those historically modest homes in rosemary hills are now some of most expensive in Silver Spring (Woodside non-withstanding) and being snatched up not by lower SES people of color looking to get in to BCC for as cheap as possible.
Yes but it's also the closest geographic high-school to many parts of Silver Spring so it makes sense. In fact, BCC was originally part of the DCC until the parents were able to get the county to change this.
This is categoricAlly untrue but you post this on every thread of this topic. Stop spreading untruths.
BCC was never supposed to be part of the DCC!
Yes, it was initially.
It was mentioned but never went far or made it to the logistics phase. The school felt it already sacrificed enough and had its quota of silver spring kids pulling down its averages.
It would have become the number one requested school by a mile in the consortium maxing out its enrollment every year and disappointing thousands. The choice in the DCC is for lesser desirable schools not more, that is how the program works in practice. If all the east county kids put it as an option and not 1 BCC kid ever selected a different school what would be the point in putting it in the pool? Look at the schools in the any of the consortiums and look at the schools not them, even a blind person can see the pattern. Now which side of the pattern is BCC on.
Look, I have no desire for my child to attend B-CC, but it's 100 kids under capacity this year while East County schools are hundreds of kids over the max. Even a small number of kids moving to a school where there is room for them would have a material benefit. I'd argue that B-CC ends up in the study for sure, and maxxes out enrollment in the first year.
What did you think living in the poorer denser part of an area would entail. Poke aside one year attendance metrics are not really what capacity planning is about. They have very specific ratios of bedrooms to students and is “supposed” to be factored into the permitting process. They also have to factor in the pipeline of all the feeder and population fluctuations. Couple to a lag in the system it’s hard. BCC was over capacity for years before their renovations and coupled to the explosive Condo growth IBs I doubt it will be under for long looking at the Elementaries.
The formulas do a better job projecting the more stable SFH areas where their resources add stability. The current assessment will be plucking areas for the new schools more.
There will be a little shuffling at the edges but not at the core schools that feed into the new high school. Einstein will lose a feeder almost assuredly from Kensington, it isn’t going to lose additional ones to BCC