WSJ Report: Biden out of it from day one

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:guys, you elected a senile 78yr old who has a pea brain and no morals.

if somebody else ran the WH in the past 4 years, then kudos to them, they did a great job. now we have unelected druggie Elon meeting foreign leaders, deciding cabinet members, dictating the agenda, threatening elected reps if they dont vote how he wants and so on. let's brace for the next four years and hope that Trump can have handlers half as good as Biden's

What a deranged viewpoint when unelected POS handlers were effectively green lighting corrupt, POS leadership at State in circumventing U.S. laws to prop up a terrorist regime in Tel Aviv.

Shame on anyone who thinks these scumbags acted in the best interests of the U.S. …

[Anonymous]

Yet we hear NOTHING about the felon and his open-mouthed staring, his stumbling into a dump truck, his inability to remember the name of his opponent, his maniacal ramblings, his unwillingness to provide us with an independent doctor’s report.

Do these journalists have a gun to their head? It sounds like they are obeying in advance.

We seriously need to create independent media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

Pathetic, outrageous, sad, treasonous of the “whisperers” … however, doesn’t make me feel less disdain for Biden himself. He couldn’t not have gone the entire time unaware of his condition.

When you have declining memory you are unaware of the condition.

The article is particularly scathing about how his negative polls against Trump was not released to him.

[Anonymous]

It is a particularly scathing article given the leftist bent of the WSJ news section.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/biden-white-house-age-function-diminished-3906a839?st=NXCZ9F&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

[Anonymous]

Honestly these are real villains and not Kamala or the ex obama people that ran her campaign. People like Donilon, Richetti and Klain and Jill Biden who were probably really running the country and pushing their leftward policies that sunk the democrats.

I'm sure he had some "good days" but he was absentee for a good chunk of it and was manipulated by those around him wanting to stay in power.

[Anonymous]

Trump is scumbag but doesn't hide who he is. Biden ran as someone that was going to return to normalcy and some moral high ground and it's all been a big sham.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why him? Was there no other candidate or does the deep state like a senile puppet?

Because it was 2020 and the dems were busy fighting amongst themselves over who could defund the police fastest.

Just like the republicans are now fighting about who can defund federal law enforcement?

I don't understand this reaction. I'm not taking a position on defunding the police. I'm describing how Biden got elected.

If we are doing a post mortem on the 2020 democratic primary in an effort to understand how Biden ultimately got elected, you have to consider that a large portion of the field took very liberal positions that made Biden appear to many voters to be the only electable candidate in comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

Pathetic, outrageous, sad, treasonous of the “whisperers” … however, doesn’t make me feel less disdain for Biden himself. He couldn’t not have gone the entire time unaware of his condition.

When you have declining memory you are unaware of the condition.

The article is particularly scathing about how his negative polls against Trump was not released to him.

I’m not going to get into a pissing match over who knows more about neurodegenerative disease, but you are absolutely incorrect that he would have been unaware at all times of his progressive condition. It’s simply untrue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than Reagan's 2nd term?

Or Trump's upcoming term?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than Reagan's 2nd term?

Isn’t that when Reagan famously said “bring down this wall” And as we all studied in school, it came down soon afterwards. Reagan was always lucid as president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly these are real villains and not Kamala or the ex obama people that ran her campaign. People like Donilon, Richetti and Klain and Jill Biden who were probably really running the country and pushing their leftward policies that sunk the democrats.

I'm sure he had some "good days" but he was absentee for a good chunk of it and was manipulated by those around him wanting to stay in power.

Donilon blocked Biden from any information about how bad his polls were. Biden was polling badly even before the debate. Trump was leading in all national polls. Biden was also blocked from any bad press.

Agree that Donilon, Richetti, Klain and Jill were running the country.

[Anonymous]

I saw it from the beginning

Like Trump, I’m built different and almost always end up right while the crowd is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Oh, the pearl clutching about how old Biden is has resulted in electing another dementia-addled dinosaur. So I don’t care at all what the WSJ says.

Why do you care, OP?

[Anonymous]

I would pay good money for someone who was in the White House the whole time to give us some honest stories about how they kept the lie going. This will be a comedy movie or TV series someday soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is this any different than Reagan's 2nd term?

1) Reagan wasn't running for a third term.

2) There was no obvious attempt to lie and cover it up, to protect a run for another term.

Reagan was probably showing signs when he was running for his second term. Btw, Biden was also going to run for his second term

This is Reagan’s final press conference in December before he left office. There is no comparison. Reagan is on the ball, informed, coherent - everything Biden isn’t.