|
FCPS official policy is that all students must have the ability to earn up to 100% at least twice on summative assignments (whether through retakes or grade replacement) and that the highest score stands. Grades cannot be dropped if you do worse. Grades cannot be averaged. If a teacher is doing this, they are not following the mandate we were all given at the beginning of the year.
-hs teacher |
Maybe. But the higher your grade in a class, the lower the score you need on a final exam. My son is a junior and his school did not have this policy his last 2 years. I have no idea if he will ever do a retake. I do know he is very grade focused. He is big on beefing up his grades early in the year, Q1-2, to allow for slips in the spring when he finds it harder to focus (be it good weather, being almost done, who knows). Last year, without retakes, his goal was to make his finals meaningless. In other words, he only had to score 30s or 40s to keep his A. He worked his butt off to make that happen. So retake policy or not, kids fight for every number they can. I do not know, but I suspect if he can retake a 90 to get a 100 he will so his final exam is not a stressor for him. |
Maybe so, but if it’s policy, my kids will take advantage of it. |
Does this apply to IB classes as well? If so, game changer. |
It should not be allowed in AP or IB or else what justifies the 1% GPA bump? Get rid of that if they get the same mollycoddling as everyone else. |
Great question. If it does apply, it can only affect the FCPS grade. IB isn’t going to allow retakes on its assessments, the ones used to actually determine the IB score and whether a student gets college credit. I can easily see a student getting an A in the class because of this policy, but then failing the IB assessments. |
| Could someone please post a link to the policy? |
| Equity is at the center of everything we do. |
|
wow, this is really going to hurt the organic high achievers.
When you water down the top, the kids it hurts the most are the strongest students. Suddenly a 4.0 UW means nothing because there are an additional 50 kids in the grade who had it who would not have with the old policy. You guys are are rejoicing in this should realize that it has a major downside with college admissions, etc. It will make it even harder to get those elusive UVA spots that are almost 100% based on how you do relative to your classmates. Remember, your greatest competition (for UVA or Harvard) is always kids from your own school. |
+1, it doesn’t matter if they had a 2.1 GPA or 4.0 at a state college, everyone has the same diploma and college listing on their résumé. |
| Coming from my own kids experience at MCPS with retakes...my high achiever almost never retook a test. I think what is being described here with kids retaking tests for a point or two will fade. Kids will realize it is not a good use of time. My struggling kid did retake tests...however it did not turn him in to an A student. If he got a D the first time, it did not magically turn to an A. Maybe a C! |
| My student is already finding that it's hard to find the time to retake a test. He has an active schedule with sports and leadership clubs and the teachers (understandably) aren't providing tons of time in which to do test retakes. And they shouldn't. But I think that alone will limit the amount of test retakes that actually occur and save the option for the ones that really need a retake. Also, my student has found that his teachers require extra formative work before doing a test retake (also understandable) and he doesn't want to do that just to bump up a grade by a couple of points if it was already a B+ or A. |
They continue to achieve. What do you mean? |
And they can get As all year, but struggle with that last assessment and get a B and, surprise, that is your grade for the year! |
Sure. But a person who gets a 60 or 70 the first go around, likely is not capable of 100%. |