2.5 for this in Arlington?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This it the ugliest remodel I have seen in my entire life.

It's hideous and I'll never recover after clicking on the link.

[Anonymous]

It's a white box of sadness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Clarendon area has been hot for decades. You can walk everywhere from there including to the Metro and restaurants. Location, location, location!

Yeah but you can't just throw up a piece of garbage and ask for 2.5M. To start, this is an undersized lot, even for that area. The outdoor space is even more paltry than the photos, guaranteed. The basement appears to be LVP and the kitchen and bathrooms are a mess. The first floor family room or main living area looks very awkward from the photos, but it's not staged, so it's hard to tell. Which brings me to my last point, why didnt they stage it?

There's a lot to complain about, but LVP in the basement is the right choice. You don't put real wood below grade.

In a luxury home the right choice is tile in the basement. Just my opinion. But since this house is awful LVP works here.

why would you want tile?

the wood floors upstairs look likely nice

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Clarendon area has been hot for decades. You can walk everywhere from there including to the Metro and restaurants. Location, location, location!

Yeah but you can't just throw up a piece of garbage and ask for 2.5M. To start, this is an undersized lot, even for that area. The outdoor space is even more paltry than the photos, guaranteed. The basement appears to be LVP and the kitchen and bathrooms are a mess. The first floor family room or main living area looks very awkward from the photos, but it's not staged, so it's hard to tell. Which brings me to my last point, why didnt they stage it?

There's a lot to complain about, but LVP in the basement is the right choice. You don't put real wood below grade.

In a luxury home the right choice is tile in the basement. Just my opinion. But since this house is awful LVP works here.

why would you want tile?

the wood floors upstairs look likely nice

Bc it's a nicer waterproof material and it doesn't have the offgassing issues of LVP. I would never put vinyl flooring anywhere in my home, and I certainly don't think it's appropriate at this price point (though you see it all the time in homes around here).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow that is truly an awful house, ugly exterior, builder grade interior, tiny lot and backyard. No way is this crappy flip (I hope) getting 2.5m, you can do soooo much better for that amount of money) or even for $2m/slightly under 2 in that general area)

It doesn't look like a flip to me. Looks like a new build, though an ugly one.

It says in the listing it's Reno.

It says newly constructed.

Discover the epitome of contemporary luxury at 258 N Barton St, Arlington, VA, a newly constructed

Yeah it's a new construction. If you look at the listing pictures from 2022 the house looks very very different (it was a teardown listing).

Also, not sure about this of course, but it seems like they may have spent around 1.2m on the construction of that awful ugly places (homes.com is amazing for not only seeing old listings, but also mortgage info).

It’s obvious they reused the exterior walls and framing, moved interior walls and plumbing, and clad in a new exterior to fool buyers.

[Anonymous]

Link should come with NSFW disclaimer. Awful

[Anonymous]

No garage for this price. It's also near Washington Lee Apartments and you could have spillover issues where cars are parking in front of this house to go to the apartments. I wouldn't count on having consistent street parking available.

So, at best you have parking for two or three cars tandem on your driveway, but who wants to deal with tandem parking when spending over $2M?

Also, when I saw that first picture, I thought that was the back of the house, but unfortunately it's the front and it's rather sad-looking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No garage for this price. It's also near Washington Lee Apartments and you could have spillover issues where cars are parking in front of this house to go to the apartments. I wouldn't count on having consistent street parking available.

So, at best you have parking for two or three cars tandem on your driveway, but who wants to deal with tandem parking when spending over $2M?

Also, when I saw that first picture, I thought that was the back of the house, but unfortunately it's the front and it's rather sad-looking.

I could get over no garage for a house at that price point if it was adjacent to a desirable part of the R-B corridor and not hideously ugly. But this house checks none of those boxes. I too thought that was the back of this house at first glance!!!

[Anonymous]

The description says new construction with motivated builder. So it’s not a reno. Which somehow makes it worse to me because this wasn’t just a random person with poor design tastes.

It also looks like something from the 2000s-2010s when white/black/gray everything was in style, hard to believe it’s new

[Anonymous]

Awful

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The description says new construction with motivated builder. So it’s not a reno. Which somehow makes it worse to me because this wasn’t just a random person with poor design tastes.

It also looks like something from the 2000s-2010s when white/black/gray everything was in style, hard to believe it’s new

I think the listing is lying about new construction; I think they can claim it because it was over 70% remodeled. But this was not torn down to foundation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The description says new construction with motivated builder. So it’s not a reno. Which somehow makes it worse to me because this wasn’t just a random person with poor design tastes.

It also looks like something from the 2000s-2010s when white/black/gray everything was in style, hard to believe it’s new

I think the listing is lying about new construction; I think they can claim it because it was over 70% remodeled. But this was not torn down to foundation.

Look at street view, this house has exact same setbacks as the cottage there before.