Explain implications of Arizona abortion ruling to me like I'm 5 years old

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

This is the most sophmoric reasoning I have ever seen. Congrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here. Please, let's stay on topic. Let's not go off on a tangent about pro-life vs anti-life.

It sounds to me like Trump was trying to stop abortion from being an issue in November, but Arizona's Supreme Court ensured that it will be an issue, in Arizona and beyond, due to the strictness of the law there.

In other words, they would have been happier if this ruling had come about after November, when Trump would have potentially already been elected. Then it wouldn't affect the electability of Republicans throughout the country.

Thanks everyone! I appreciate you helping me connect the dots on this one.

Yeah, thanks, we’ll be sure to follow your directive not to go off on a tangent about pro-life vs “anti-life”, as you so eloquently put it, when this is not an “anti-life” discussion. It’s a pro-choice discussion. In fact, what’s anti-life is when women who need abortions to survive an unviable pregnancy are denied one. But you already knew that. Much as you probably already knew the answer to the question you posted here today.

[Anonymous]

For anyone paying attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

This is the most sophmoric reasoning I have ever seen. Congrats.

Too bad for you. I’m a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

This is the most sophmoric reasoning I have ever seen. Congrats.

Too bad for you. I’m a woman.

Ehhhh, ok. I'm sure that matter somehow, somewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

This is the most sophmoric reasoning I have ever seen. Congrats.

Too bad for you. I’m a woman.

Ehhhh, ok. I'm sure that matter somehow, somewhere.

^ Typical lib stuck in his bubble.

[Anonymous]

Like you’re 5: women will die, have permanent disabilities and lose their fertility preventable deaths because doctors will be too afraid to intervene when pregnancies go horribly wrong until the woman is literally half dead. And by then, you may not be able to get her back. And if you can, she may have permanent damage to her health and/or fertility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For anyone paying attention.

Absolutely. No doubt at all about this pathway to ban abortion. Project 2025 is going to force catholic norms on us all if Trump is elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like you’re 5: women will die, have permanent disabilities and lose their fertility preventable deaths because doctors will be too afraid to intervene when pregnancies go horribly wrong until the woman is literally half dead. And by then, you may not be able to get her back. And if you can, she may have permanent damage to her health and/or fertility.

None of that will happen but there might be some babies born who would otherwise have ended up in a trash can.

Of course it will happen, it already has in Texas which was one of the first states to ban abortion.
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/texas-abortion-hearing-lawsuit-b2378498.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

Weird that you don’t equate a women’s ability to get an abortion for her health with safety.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

The dog caught the car! Be careful what you wish for! The GOP caught a tiger by it's tail.

In simple words, they got what they wanted and the GOP lost the 2018, 2020, 2022, elections. They just lost Arizona in the 2024 and will lose not only the White House but also the House a d the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barry Goldwater was so right about the influence of organized religion in politics.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

Weird that you don’t equate a women’s ability to get an abortion for her health with safety.

For most women, intervening to end the life within her, is so much more risky than allowing her baby to have a normal birth. Study obstetrics, my friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

This is the most sophmoric reasoning I have ever seen. Congrats.

Too bad for you. I’m a woman.

Ehhhh, ok. I'm sure that matter somehow, somewhere.

^ Typical lib stuck in his bubble.

I genuinely don't think you're trying to keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP here. So they got what they wanted and are unhappy about it? Is that only because voters can undo it in November?

This is what I don't get: they got what they wanted! Are they upset that what they wanted is TOO strict?

Make it make sense.

If by “they” you mean GOP, well then, yes. When has MAGA ever made sense?

Um, easy: border security. That’s what most of us care about, our basic safety, not getting an abortion.

Weird that you don’t equate a women’s ability to get an abortion for her health with safety.

For most women, intervening to end the life within her, is so much more risky than allowing her baby to have a normal birth. Study obstetrics, my friend.

👆does their own research. 🤡