Just how much do you think we are talking about here? |
Just gat a prenup that protects premarital assets or put them in a trust. |
They’re in trust. I’m not talking about my assets, they’re protectable/protected already. I’m talking about the a hassle of rending apart two homes, finding new housing etc. I don’t even want to live with a partner - his house, my house/ his life with his kids my life with my kids works for me. I don’t want to blend lives fully, or to “become one”. I’ll happily stay as “two who love each other without governmental involvement” |
| Women remarry for money. |
|
I’ve been divorced for seven years and had no intention of getting remarried. I’m secure, have a good career, great friend and hobbies that keep me busy. I dated casually until I met a great man who I still had no intention of marrying. After several years together I’m starting to change my mind. If I do get remarried it’ll be strictly for practical reasons. My eventual retired health insurance is better than his, and his eventual retirement money is better than mine. We will both have pensions and survivor money would be left on the table if we weren’t married. We both still intend for our premarital estates to go to our own kids and the assets are in our own trusts. Prenup is TBD. Added bonus is that I just enjoy every second we’re together.
I think it goes from being an emotional decision when you’re younger to a practical one. |
|
The question is most interesting when it involves a couple that intends to be a couple for life, and have roughly balanced (comfortable) financials so that it’s not about protecting one party or the other financially.
I’m very seriously involved in my sixties with a woman also in her sixties, each of us married once before for many decades. I think the only reasons (minor ones) for us not to get married are 1) that we would probably blow $70k+ on a fantastic wedding, and 2) we like spending about five hours a day together but also like a lot of time apart and 3) we like not having to make any compromises about the physical elements of our respective homes 15 minutes apart. I can easily wrap my head around the choice of cohabitating while unmarried, but being married and keeping separate houses is highly unusual/more odd (and I would quickly tire of explaining our choice to people). |
Many older couples do the "living apart together" model like yours. It can work if the distance between the residences is short, like yours. Gets harder when there is a longer drive time, especially as the couple ages and driving becomes a challenge. IMO the biggest reason not to marry at that stage of life is often the adult children and grandchildren. Like it or not, inheritance and long-term care issues come into the equation and can be a big challenge. Adult kids love it when their older parent has a spouse/partner that is looking out for them, caring for them and being a companion. But there is typically very little loyalty to that second spouse when parent dies or is fully incapacitated. I've seen elderly second spouses (late 70s & 80s) get kicked out immediately upon death of the spouse, due to home being part of adult children's inheritance. Don't get married, ALWAYS keep your own home that you solely have control over, and don't give a damn what other people think. |
This is where we're at. Paperwork or not, we plan to be together for good. We've each set up trusts for the kids, own our own houses, etc. Because our kids still live at home and we live in different states, it makes no sense for us to marry right now. But we have several unwritten "emergencies" that we've discussed that would get us to marry because it would be silly NOT to. The biggest is health coverage - mine is better than his. He's also a few years older than I am and has a family history of heart issues. If something big happened health-wise to him, we'd be at the courthouse immediately. Otherwise, we play it by ear. There's no getting around that marriage allows you to take care of each other in ways that are harder to come by otherwise. |
Perks for women are minimal?
Not according to this one! Nor to my wife: got everything paid for for 20 years, then decided life's too short to deal with the annoyance of a spouse who'd like her to put down her phone or help out around the hosue, so off she goes... with even more of my money! |
|
I married for papers, the loser never worked. I'm in no hurry to get married unless the love of my life needs papers. I would only do it once kids are adults. I would give away most of my money to my kids, and then get married.
New DH and I can build financial security together. Easier than prenup and who know what else. Money is not the problem. Finding the man and getting him is the problem. I have a candidate though. I don't know who gets married again and again.People who believe in love a lot more than I do I guess. |
+1 Our assets will all go to the kids if I pass first (not likely, given DH's hidden health issues). No gold digger will change that. |
LOL at married lady responding. Women like you who assume other women are gold diggers are gross. Go back to your bubble with your unhealthy husband. You married for money, doesn’t mean we all do. I have my own. |
+1. Same. |
You realize that traditionally, marriage has nothing to do with love, right? It has been a financial contract until the 20th century when the love thing became a component. Marriage is not about love: it is about financial protection for raising children. |
I made the practical decision when I was young (equal financial partners). I am divorced. |