Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Unfortunately for you, that Stanford's white male president resigned last year due to his research lab producing falsified data proves that you're wrong. People have been forced aside for plagiarism in the past. Why are some of you pretending this is a new form of punishment and the witch hunt was solely because Gay was black? The reason Gay is so controversial is because she was a mediocre academic with a lackluster history of minimal publication and no books who rose to the top in a publish or perish environment where advancement and reputation are built upon not just volume of output but depth of citation history and peer reviews (in short, the more people that cite you, the more accomplished and successful you are). This system actually makes it hard to plagiarize and get away with it in the long run because of the role of peer reviewers validating your research and data. Peer reviewers did ask for Gay's data 20 years ago for her most important publication, an article that was the basis for her tenure, because they found it unreplicable and insufficient, but she refused to hand it over. Normally this is a major red flag. But Gay was allowed to get away without close scrutiny because she was a protected species in higher education: a black woman. It's hard to deny her race protected her for so long. It's not to imply there can't be corruption elsewhere in academia or that there aren't other prominent faculty, white or black or Asian, who quietly fiddled with their research. I'm sure there are others crossing their fingers and staying out of the limelight. But Gay put herself in the limelight and made herself a target and her past history caught up. Spectacularly, as it turned out. If she had been content to remain dean, none of this would have happened. |
Agree. Ridiculous that she will get that insane amount of money. |
Failure to cite is plagiarism, genius. That far right wing publication, the New York Times, found 47 such instances (and counting). |
|
How much are coaches of football teams (not at Harvard) paid?
|
Many top univ presidents make a lot more. Fair question as to how much she should make after resigning. She probably had some ground to sue Harvard and have this get a lot uglier. |
It’s not the complaints about plagiarism that is so disgusting in this. It’s the insinuation that she did it because she is black and was chosen because affirmative action when your lot was screaming that Marc Tessigier-Levigne was forced out of Stanford because he is a cis white male. Add in that traitor Stefanik’s grudge and abuse of office here and it’s beyond disgusting. Let’s see HER academic work. I intend to go through it with a fine-toothed comb. Maybe Harvard should rescind her degree. |
| Please join the thread in the Political Forum. |