Literally tell your kid she can't go. Done. When kids talk back to teachers does that mean that she does as well? No. Just because someone else is breaking a rule doesn't mean you should too. And guess what if she does....its part of growing up. Relax |
You must be MCPS admin. You can keep denying MCPS has liability and obligation to uphold and enforce its policies if you want to. MCPS, and we the taxpayers, keep paying out judgements where judges and juries disagree with you and say MCPS has a duty to actually do what it says it will do. You should quit education. It’s not for you. |
| No one likes a tattletale |
Wrong - just a parent that thinks this is crazy. Also, I am not the only one responding to you. I am beginning to think you are that lady that runs that website that wants MCPS liable for everything so every morning you wake up and think of something new. Turf, closed lunch, etc. I understand MCPS has issues but this is not one of them. |
You keep minimizing this, even though the very serious criminal and life threatening incidents that have come from kids venturing out during lunch when they’re not supposed to has been shared. What do you gain from pushing this agenda? Why are you invested in not holding MCPS schools accountable for enforcing its own closed campus policies? |
Poolesville also has open lunch for all grades. |
Tell that to the DoorDash driver who had a gun shoved in her mouth by B-CC kids who were out and about in the community during lunch just a few weeks ago. You’re in denial and refuse to engage with the real harm and risk that comes from not enforcing this policy. Why you are doing so, only you know. |
| you sound bat S&*% crazy |
So, your theory is that open lunch in Bethesda is why the carjacking happened in Wheaton? That's just silly. |
Open lunch IS why kids who otherwise would have been in the school building and not available to roam the streets and assault someone were able to do so. Yes. That is not a leap in logic. Which is why revoking open lunch privileges is a disciplinary measures schools take because it’s a privilege based on trust and meeting expectations. If B-CC had a closed lunch policy that the school actively monitored and enforced, those kids would not have been able to do what they did when they did it. There is no doubt about that. If you followed the conversation around juvenile crime, one of the main things contributing to the increase in juvenile crime is kids not being in school when they should be. But you don’t care about that because you don’t care about the youth or the community. You just want to absolve MCPS of any and all responsibility for the care and wellbeing of students while they are in the school building for reasons known only to you. |
|
Again you sound crazy but I will agree that kids being out of school is exactly why there is a rise in crime. When schools shut down in 2020 there were kids who were barely hanging on then. Those kids did not come back ....EVER. They are the ones robbing stores, carjacking and joyriding now at the age of 16 17 etc. Direct result of shutting down schools.
Open lunch though has nothing to do with this. A kid can skip a class and get out anyway. You haven't brought up your daughter in any of your posts in a while. Does she even exist or are you really the lady from that website that blames MCPS for everything? |
| There is no MCPS closed lunch policy. Some schools have open lunch and have had open lunch for many generations. Other schools became closed campus when they moved or reopened. There are pros and cons to both open and closed campuses. |
This |
But that's probably because it's 20+ miles to the closest fast-food that nobody would use it. |
Why have any rules if you don't enforce them? Wait, MCPS went to very few rules and then wonders why kids are acting as they are. Same with parents. It's a safety issue. Some schools have easily accessible restaurants, others don't. If a kid gets hit by a car, during school hours, MCPS should be liable. |