Liz Cheney For President 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No way. This is a democracy. Not a hereditary monarchy. One Chaney was one too many. Liz is good where she’s at.

Amen!

There are over 300 million people in this country. We can definitely do better.

We can't do any better than Trump and Biden as our presidential candidates so why try? haha

[Anonymous]

I respect her for bucking her party, but I’m a no on her for president. There’s a much better candidate who can actually win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She wouldn’t scare me so that puts her ahead of the other gop candidates.

I think she has integrity.
I loathed her father, but she's not her father.
She's a conservative Republican, but she's ethical.
That's how low the bar is for the GOP.
She's not horribly corrupt like Dumpy.
I would vote for Biden ahead of her because of his stand on environmental issues, Ukraine, immigration, etc.
But I don't hate her, so that's something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Obama was very well qualified in 2012 after serving his first 4 year term and he served the country very well in his second term. It's easy to see where we messed up big time when comparing Obama's resume to Hillary's or McCain's in 2008 and that mishap led us down the road to Trump 2016. Oops

We didn't make a mistake in 2008 or 2016 in passing on Clinton. The Clinton family was a terrible corrupt family. We did not need a Clinton dynasty. One was enough for the country to know that we didn't need to repeat it. The real error was in letting an unelectable candidate run in 2016. If we had had a different Democratic candidate in 2016, we would not have had Trump. We elected the second worst candidate in history because he ran against the worst candidate in history.

Can you please write me up a list of the things that make the Clinton family a "terrible corrupt family?"

Thanks,

Since you are apparently young and unaware of history, here you go:

https://www.npr.org/2016/06/12/481718785/clinton-scandals-a-guide-from-whitewater-to-the-clinton-foundation

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4821673/presidential-scandals-clinton-administration

But I'm sure they are all made up, political allegations and actually the Clintons are squeaky clean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Obama was very well qualified in 2012 after serving his first 4 year term and he served the country very well in his second term. It's easy to see where we messed up big time when comparing Obama's resume to Hillary's or McCain's in 2008 and that mishap led us down the road to Trump 2016. Oops

We didn't make a mistake in 2008 or 2016 in passing on Clinton. The Clinton family was a terrible corrupt family. We did not need a Clinton dynasty. One was enough for the country to know that we didn't need to repeat it. The real error was in letting an unelectable candidate run in 2016. If we had had a different Democratic candidate in 2016, we would not have had Trump. We elected the second worst candidate in history because he ran against the worst candidate in history.

Can you please write me up a list of the things that make the Clinton family a "terrible corrupt family?"

Thanks,

Since you are apparently young and unaware of history, here you go:

https://www.npr.org/2016/06/12/481718785/clinton-scandals-a-guide-from-whitewater-to-the-clinton-foundation

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4821673/presidential-scandals-clinton-administration

But I'm sure they are all made up, political allegations and actually the Clintons are squeaky clean.

Scandalous? The Clintons? Maybe so. Terrible/corrupt family? Absolutely not. I sure would feel a lot better with a 1990s version of Clinton in the White House managing US foreign and domestic policy during today's times than the unhinged orange guy or the elderly guy (Biden, the 46th president, is almost 4 years older than our 42nd president that was first elected over 30 years ago- ouch).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No way. This is a democracy. Not a hereditary monarchy. One Chaney was one too many. Liz is good where she’s at.

You sound bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Obama was very well qualified in 2012 after serving his first 4 year term and he served the country very well in his second term. It's easy to see where we messed up big time when comparing Obama's resume to Hillary's or McCain's in 2008 and that mishap led us down the road to Trump 2016. Oops

Liz Cheney is far more qualified than Obama was when he first ran for president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Obama was very well qualified in 2012 after serving his first 4 year term and he served the country very well in his second term. It's easy to see where we messed up big time when comparing Obama's resume to Hillary's or McCain's in 2008 and that mishap led us down the road to Trump 2016. Oops

Liz Cheney is far more qualified than Obama was when he first ran for president.

Yes but not more qualified than Obama 2012.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Other than the times where they bucked against their respective parties' positions, what makes either one of them qualified?

What made Obama qualified?

Obama was very well qualified in 2012 after serving his first 4 year term and he served the country very well in his second term. It's easy to see where we messed up big time when comparing Obama's resume to Hillary's or McCain's in 2008 and that mishap led us down the road to Trump 2016. Oops

Liz Cheney is far more qualified than Obama was when he first ran for president.

Yes but not more qualified than Obama 2012.

Um, that's not the comparison. We're talking about the qualifications of two first-time candidates for president. His 2012 candidacy is irrelevant to the discussion.

[Anonymous]

It is time for a real centrist ticket --
JOE MANCHON FOR PRESIDENT AND LIZ CHENEY FOR VICE--- GET IT ROLLIN '!!!

[Anonymous]

Time for a real centrist ticket--
JOE MANCHON--PRESOIDENT
LIZ CHENEY ---VICE

As the 9/11 real heroes said--- Let's Roll

[Anonymous]

With J. Bidens doddard debate performance, it is time to make a real change!!
Joe Manchin+-PRESIDENT
Liz Cheney ---VICE president

[Anonymous]

Joe Manchin is age 76 or 77. Nooooo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Joe Manchin is age 76 or 77. Nooooo.

Way too young.

[Anonymous]

Where did Liz go? She said she’d run 3rd party to thwart Trump. Feels like there’s an underground advocacy group planning something. Cheney/Harris or Harris/Cheney?