| It's creepy when the person doesn't have their camera on, but when they share their screen to show something, it shows that they're watching YOU on their screen. I forever write them off as a creep and I feel violated. |
| Camera on is an unnecessary distraction IMO. The focus should be on the message not on the messenger. Personally I tend to get distracted when the camera is on. You can’t not focus on expressions when the camera is on. Some of us have RBFs when we are tryin to concentrate, which can be misconstrued. I am at my focused best when the camera is off. Camera on makes me self conscious. At the end of the day, it’s about getting work done. There are different ways to do it. Feeling the need to prove that you’re adding value by being on camera, is a little too much. But that’s just my opinion. |
LOL. So turns yours off. |
| The Botox is crazy those big foreheads with no wrinkles look bizarre. |
I sort of feel this way too. We have these meetings with about 8 of us. 5 of us always have our cameras on and we contribute to the meeting. The cameras off people don't speak even. It's like they're just there to creep on us. We're all peers, and none of our managers are on. And about what we did before zoom- we would get together in our conference rooms with a video camera if everyone wasn't in the same city. I'm a millennial and don't remember a time before video cameras. |
Same. On for small meetings, off for big ones unless you’re speaking. |
|
i wish there was a feature to only have your camera on but only visible to others when speaking. meaning that only the person speaking is visible, not to be confused with when there is only one speaker.
yes there is a speaker only view on zoom but i mean from the user end. if that makes sense? |
Thats wild to me, and I'm 43. Prior to 2020, video call at my work was reserved for something like an address by the head of the organization. But I would talk on the phone with people all over the world, and had years-long friendly relationships with many. I mean, people used to do this by paper letter! Even today, plenty of friendships are sustained mostly through texts. I'm not anti video, but I think video-on mandates put the emphasis in the wrong place. The point is the relationship. Video does not get you there by itself, and can be a distraction. |
Are the meetings mandatory? |
Same age and I agree. We used to meet in conference rooms and dial in others who weren't there on the speakerphone, but we didn't do video until Covid. |
This person complains in every thread that their workforce is required to be remote. It is a bit unhinged. |
|
My assumption is that they are not fully present or don't look put together yet. I have a job where we sometimes Zoom at 7:30 am and I assume people literally haven't combed their hair yet if they aren't on camera. Which for that particular meeting is actually fine. Later in the day I assume they are not paying attention or doing something else -- like folding laundry, walking their dog, whatever. Which is not totally fine.
FWIW, at my job we generally have meetings with under 30 people or so, and we do have a culture of having cameras on. |
Lol. "Bosses" "don't know how to treat people like adults." I'll treat people like adults when they act like adults. Or when they get their work done. Whichever comes first. |
| Cameras on is stupid. People keep their cameras off so they don't have to make a quaint little Zoom background, or dress in professional attire, or do their hair, and all those other ridiculous things that have zero to do with productivity or job performance. If you hear their voice, they're participating, and they get their work done well and on time, then who cares if someone prefers a phone conference over a video conference? |
| On only when speaking, and only in a "formal" meeting with people outside my immediate team. If I'm only dealing with my boss, we talk on the phone like normal humans. |