Emory was ranked 22 last year and 24 this year so if your grandparents couldn't notice that then I dont.know what to tell them. |
they are more peers today than 20 years ago, for sure. |
Don't disagree with you, but it's not the Ivies that are going to improve social mobility or decrease income inequality. In fact, they are doing the opposite. |
Wishful thinking. |
+1 Emory already announced record apps for their fly in program 1600 apps for 100 spots. I'm sure WashU will be fine too, and frankly who needs more striver Asians on campus. |
Are you first gen or second generation Asian American? Probably second generation and the PP is first generation. |
Not a huge margin of difference in most households. |
Agree. Also, some kids might LOOK "WASPiest" to you, but might be first gen, you really have no idea. |
No, we're first gen (although came to US relatively young). Kids are second gen. |
I do think coming to the US when you are young or studying undergrad or masters here changes perspectives. |
| Disagree with PP about the impact on Asians, generally in our community they still aim for the same schools regardless of year-to-year shifts. Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, Penn, Duke, Columbia, are the ones I see are very popular and highly desirable amongst Asians in our area. |
| You guys put way to stock into these rankings! Do you really think an employer will say, hey, we aren't recruiting from Dartmouth this year because they dropped? C'mon, get serious... |
Don't disagree with you. Having a mother who was a teacher and parents who highly valued education also gives us our currant perspective. We don't automatically pick the top of any ranking list simply because they ranked the top. I believe that gives us more nuance in our thinking. |
Absolutely agree |
This is illogical, and sounds like a coping mechanism for when said student gets rejected from.these schools. Students who care a lot about rankings would not have a high yield rate for schools like Emory and WashU. If they applied only because it was a highly ranked and was accepted , they would have gone somewhere else that had a better brand or was more highly ranked. Getting rid of students that don't really want to go but are only applying for ranks helps the yield rate of both of these schools, which in turn lowers or maintains the current acceptance rate. Also Emory didn't "drop" in the rankings, 2 spots is more of a margin for error. |