I went to Wash. U. and loved Wash. U. I think the different rating strategies are fine. Different people want different things. Great. The problem is with parents who somehow got the idea that Wash. U. was more prestigious than Berkeley because a magazine said so. Sorry, but no. Flatter, yes. More traditional looking, sure. Comfier, probably. But… more prestigious? No. |
|
They certainly should. Both of these schools provide no better academics than the average large state school (think Virginia Tech). They just happened to be ranked high because the rankings favored wealthy privates.
|
|
| Yes. For those schools that have fallen and particularly those that have fallen out of the top 50, less students will ED and choose a different school. Not a large public but a different private. Lehigh is going to get some of those applicants from Miami, Tulane and Villanova. |
I agree Tulane is where it should be. And it probably will be hurt by this. Tulane is full of rich mediocre students who want to party but also want to say they go to a highly ranked school with name recognition. The not so smart person I know who is a freshman this year loves to talk about how she got into a school with a 10% acceptance rate. Of course we all know that is BS and the overall acceptance rate is only that low because they take 80% of the class ED, during which the acceptance rate is probably over 50%. |
|
Yes. They will drop. As much as we bash the rankings. Kids (and parents) are driven by them.
You watch. Application will fall and acceptance rates will rise. |
|
I was there before it was even a national university.
It also cost 1/4 of what it does now. It attracts high achieving students no matter where it sits. And yes, there is a lot to be said for smaller class sizes. I had 2 classes my whole 4 years that were larger and held in a lecture hall. There are definitely diversity problems there, something that didn’t occur to me in the 90s. I have a great group of friends that I keep in touch with. Just saw a sorority sister a month ago that was sending her second child off to Wake. I think the actual middle class has been squeezed out of places like this for quite a while. They aren’t known for tons of merit. So either your parents have a ton of dough or you are getting a lot of financial aid (lower income) |
Do you think they will drop this year? Or next? |
don’t forget fast-rising Michigan State!!!! |
|
They could drop in applications because on the spectrum of all parents/students, there is some percentage that actually care about these rankings even though they do not matter in reality. So those people may apply elsewhere.
That being said, Wake especially is still a very good school just like it was yesterday and last year. It is lower for the three things it does or has whether you prefer them or not: 1. Small classes 2. Highly educated professors who actually teach the classes 3. A large portion of the student body is at least middle to upper middle class with a lower percentage of students in the lower deciles financially speaking only So in the rankings, Wake loses in all three. It is like a teacher telling you the best you can perform on a test is a 70. I could quibble with #3 but a lot of the top schools are full of UMC and wealthy types. The first two should not cause a school to drop, that seems an odd way of creating the rankings. |
| I don’t care much about rankings but plenty of people do so those that dropped significantly, it’s gotta hurt. Maybe it will make it easier to get into now for the rest of us. |
| Yes they will. Parents ( and HS students) react to the USNWR rankings. Tulane will become less popular and Wake Forest will drop to regional school status. Duke and UNC Chapel Hill are it in NC. |
I appreciate your perspective. |
Except for a large portion of the Wake student body is from NY, NJ, Mass and Connecticut. |
As long as Duke and UNC(oos) have acceptance rates below 10 percent, Wake will be just fine. Who knows what the ranking will be next year. |