IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the DoJ and FBI did their job, Congress wouldn't need these hearings

The DOJ did their job convicting Devon Archer πŸ˜†
https://nypost.com/2023/06/07/ex-hunter-biden-biz-partner-devon-archer-loses-appeal-in-federal-fraud-case/amp/


On actions not related to the Biden Inc... just like all the previous (Manafort, Papadopoulos, Page abd now Luft) charged for something different to scare them into not testifying.

"Show me the man and I will show you the crume" - Lavrentiy Beria

Luft was indicted before the election that put these Republican clowns in charge of the House. It had nothing to do with testifying.


Bless your heart...

Luft reached out to the DoJ in March 2019 about Biden Inc and was interviewed in Belgium for two days. Then crickets until 2022 indictment


In case you missed it, Luft is a criminal in his own right who is trying furiously to save his own skin.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the DoJ and FBI did their job, Congress wouldn't need these hearings

The DOJ did their job convicting Devon Archer πŸ˜†
https://nypost.com/2023/06/07/ex-hunter-biden-biz-partner-devon-archer-loses-appeal-in-federal-fraud-case/amp/


On actions not related to the Biden Inc... just like all the previous (Manafort, Papadopoulos, Page abd now Luft) charged for something different to scare them into not testifying.

"Show me the man and I will show you the crume" - Lavrentiy Beria

Luft was indicted before the election that put these Republican clowns in charge of the House. It had nothing to do with testifying.


Bless your heart...

Luft reached out to the DoJ in March 2019 about Biden Inc and was interviewed in Belgium for two days. Then crickets until 2022 indictment


March 2019 would have been Barr and Trump's DoJ in charge.

I only see a few ways to read this:

1.) Trump's DoJ talked to Luft but found nothing to work with
2.) Trump's DoJ bungled and dropped the ball on this
3.) (the weirdest and most outlandish) is that Barr squashed it for some reason

My money is on number 1. And most likely, when they talked to Luft in Belgium there were enough red flags going off about Luft to spark an investigation into Luft himself.

TBH I don't even know how Luft would have even been in any kind of position with any kind of access to be a whistleblower in the first place.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.


Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the DoJ and FBI did their job, Congress wouldn't need these hearings

The DOJ did their job convicting Devon Archer πŸ˜†
https://nypost.com/2023/06/07/ex-hunter-biden-biz-partner-devon-archer-loses-appeal-in-federal-fraud-case/amp/


On actions not related to the Biden Inc... just like all the previous (Manafort, Papadopoulos, Page abd now Luft) charged for something different to scare them into not testifying.

"Show me the man and I will show you the crume" - Lavrentiy Beria

Luft was indicted before the election that put these Republican clowns in charge of the House. It had nothing to do with testifying.


AFTER he had gone to authorities about Biden, Inc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.


Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!


You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This week the IRS whistleblowers will be testifying and next week Devon Archer is set to testify to the House Oversight Committee about corruption he witnessed involving the Biden crime family.

Archer is supposedly going to be discussing Hunter Biden's shady business dealings in Russia and Ukraine as well as the alleged $10 million bribe the Biden family took from Ukraine.

Archer worked very closely with Hunter Biden on Burisma's board and also met with then-VP Joe Biden at the White House around the time he and Hunter joined Burisma.

Sounds like Archer's chances to fall out from the window are now 99.9%
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.


Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!


You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.


Np- no they don’t. It’s been all over the news. Your ignorance is tedious.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The most incidious power the media has is the power of ommision. Many things about Biden Inc have come true (laptop, 10% for the big guy, folllowing the $), yet very few within the msm are covering it.


insidious
omission
following
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the DoJ and FBI did their job, Congress wouldn't need these hearings

The DOJ did their job convicting Devon Archer πŸ˜†
https://nypost.com/2023/06/07/ex-hunter-biden-biz-partner-devon-archer-loses-appeal-in-federal-fraud-case/amp/


On actions not related to the Biden Inc... just like all the previous (Manafort, Papadopoulos, Page abd now Luft) charged for something different to scare them into not testifying.

"Show me the man and I will show you the crume" - Lavrentiy Beria

Luft was indicted before the election that put these Republican clowns in charge of the House. It had nothing to do with testifying.


AFTER he had gone to authorities about Biden, Inc.


AFTER he had gone to REPUBLICAN authorities about Biden, Inc.

Why do you suppose Bill Barr shut this down? Because there was not enough credible evidence.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.


Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!


You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.


DP...google it, it is the reason this wasn't pursued by the Trump DOJ.

It is only the House GOP who knows their *cough cough* audience, who tried to pull this bologna.
Anonymous


because it doesn't exist. This is no different than emails and Benghazi...red meat for the base with just enough validity to speck off a few independents to turn an election
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The 'alternative facts' of the left continue to amaze me. In 2019 the FBI verified the laptop was real. Tony Bobolinski verified 10% for the big guy under oath, then crickets after a 5 hour debriefing with the FBI. When whistleblowers see favoritism from the DoJ, the left calls them RWNJ yet one admits to voting Democrat in the past.


Hold your jets there.

Yes, FBI verified that Hunter once owned the laptop. But they COULD NOT verify the integrity of the laptop. Again, several analyses of the laptop showed that files had been added or altered long after it was no longer in Biden's possession. DETAILS MATTER.

Second, Bobulinski's actions were highly suspect. He was in deep financial troubles, about to lose his home, and liable for paying out a $600k settlement for FRAUD. But suddenly Bobulinski's shows up out of nowhere, his bacon is saved, the $600k and other financial obligations are paid off, and the "corroborating evidence" is produced, in the form of weird photos of iPhone screenshots shown displayed on a broken Blackberry connected to a RUSSIAN cellphone provider (MTS RUS) along with his "corroborating" PDFs of emails to show both ends of alleged conversations, which show suspicious details, like missing and altered headers, and misplaced and pixelated Gmail logos (looking forged AF). And shortly after, Bobulinski drops back off the face of the earth, not to be heard from again. DETAILS MATTER.

None of it holds up well under scrutiny!


You need to cite a source... a reputable one - for the bolded.


Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-possible-tampering-trump-allies/
Anonymous
Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/202...aptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-po...pering-trump-allies/


"analysis says"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Where have you been? This has widely been reported by numerous outlets, and same conclusion of tampering found by multiple separate forensic cyber analyses of the data.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/202...aptop-data-examined/

https://cyberscoop.com/hunter-biden-emails-po...pering-trump-allies/


"analysis says"


Well, unless your have the expertise or somehow believe that Jim Jordan somehow has it, then you go with what is widely reported. Why do you believe the sources who are telling you otherwise? What credibility do they have? What are their degrees in computer forensics?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the DoJ and FBI did their job, Congress wouldn't need these hearings

The DOJ did their job convicting Devon Archer πŸ˜†
https://nypost.com/2023/06/07/ex-hunter-biden-biz-partner-devon-archer-loses-appeal-in-federal-fraud-case/amp/


On actions not related to the Biden Inc... just like all the previous (Manafort, Papadopoulos, Page abd now Luft) charged for something different to scare them into not testifying.

"Show me the man and I will show you the crume" - Lavrentiy Beria

Luft was indicted before the election that put these Republican clowns in charge of the House. It had nothing to do with testifying.


AFTER he had gone to authorities about Biden, Inc.

but is what the indictment states true? Then it doesn't matter about Biden. The guy broke laws and is a national security threat.

Let's recall that the Trump family mafia also enriched themselves when Trump was POTUS via dealings with the middle east, and all those international business issues for Trump org miraculously disappearing when Trump became POTUS. And oh, of course, all the myriad of conflict of interest issues.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: