Secret Service Concludes Investigation...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Biden administration that tells you that they don't know how a bag of cocaine got into the most secure building in the entire country is the same regime that wants you to trust them with the security of the country.

Utterly outrageous. Oh btw, whatever twit dropped the cocaine must have been wearing gloves, seeing there’s supposedly “no fingerprints” on the plastic baggie. This, in spite of the fact that plastic is just about the easiest surface from which to lift a fingerprint. Incredible!

[Anonymous]

Good lord, there must be a run on tin foil around here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Biden administration that tells you that they don't know how a bag of cocaine got into the most secure building in the entire country is the same regime that wants you to trust them with the security of the country.

Utterly outrageous. Oh btw, whatever twit dropped the cocaine must have been wearing gloves, seeing there’s supposedly “no fingerprints” on the plastic baggie. This, in spite of the fact that plastic is just about the easiest surface from which to lift a fingerprint. Incredible!

...not to mention DNA. sp

[Anonymous]

It is curious that no finger print could be found. I can understand no "matching" finger print, but not no finger print at all. That does seem fishy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is curious that no finger print could be found. I can understand no "matching" finger print, but not no finger print at all. That does seem fishy.

This is what I’m saying.

Full disclosure I’ve never done drugs, ever, not even weed, so I don’t know how people carry around their stash. I’ve seen plastic bags of it on TV dramas, but unless they put it in some sort of little box and handle it with gloves or tweezers, I fail to see how it just arrived there, fished out of someone’s pocket or purse, with no fingerprints and no DNA. What, did they wear gloves to remove the bag from their pocket? “Oh, just a minute, I need to put on gloves, for reasons.”

It’s very weird. The GOP has shown themselves to have no scruples and a willingness to do whatever they think is suitable to get the results they want. This came right on the heels of the GOP having a collective breakdown that Hunter wasn’t sufficiently punished or whatever in their mind. And unless I’m wrong, I don’t think Hunter ever did cocaine, so it’s an absolutely moronic but purposeful move by someone.

If it were a staffer, I’d like to think that person would be appropriately and confidentially dealt with and they would have said “the fingerprints were too smeared, we don’t know.” But they didn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you leave cocaine in the WH or leak a confidential SCOTUS draft to the press, you can rest well knowing every governmental investigative resource will never find out who you are.

Leak classified documents on discord however and the Feds are at your front door in 35 minutes

There is no law against leaking SCOTUS drafts. So the conservative judges will never have problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the “no suspect identified” is actually worse news for the Biden family.

Yes most likely a Secret Service agent drop the bag and now is covering it up. I would not trust the secret service if I was Biden. Good point.

According to friends who have worked in the WH and know the lay of the land, a secret service agent is the likeliest culprit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is curious that no finger print could be found. I can understand no "matching" finger print, but not no finger print at all. That does seem fishy.

“Fishy” is putting it gently, to say the least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the “no suspect identified” is actually worse news for the Biden family.

Yes most likely a Secret Service agent drop the bag and now is covering it up. I would not trust the secret service if I was Biden. Good point.

According to friends who have worked in the WH and know the lay of the land, a secret service agent is the likeliest culprit.

Is that the same agent who brought twice marijuana to the WH in 2022?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the “no suspect identified” is actually worse news for the Biden family.

Yes most likely a Secret Service agent drop the bag and now is covering it up. I would not trust the secret service if I was Biden. Good point.

According to friends who have worked in the WH and know the lay of the land, a secret service agent is the likeliest culprit.

Identifying that secret service agent would solve so many issues, don't you think so? And why would WH be covering up for the agent who commit the crime?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the “no suspect identified” is actually worse news for the Biden family.

Yes most likely a Secret Service agent drop the bag and now is covering it up. I would not trust the secret service if I was Biden. Good point.

According to friends who have worked in the WH and know the lay of the land, a secret service agent is the likeliest culprit.

Identifying that secret service agent would solve so many issues, don't you think so? And why would WH be covering up for the agent who commit the crime?

+1

Why would they close this so quickly if they did not know who did it?

[Anonymous]

I’m LMAO at all the trumper heads exploding right now, haha!

You got rolled. AGAIN.

HAHAHAHA!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is curious that no finger print could be found. I can understand no "matching" finger print, but not no finger print at all. That does seem fishy.

This is what I’m saying.

Full disclosure I’ve never done drugs, ever, not even weed, so I don’t know how people carry around their stash. I’ve seen plastic bags of it on TV dramas, but unless they put it in some sort of little box and handle it with gloves or tweezers, I fail to see how it just arrived there, fished out of someone’s pocket or purse, with no fingerprints and no DNA. What, did they wear gloves to remove the bag from their pocket? “Oh, just a minute, I need to put on gloves, for reasons.”

It’s very weird. The GOP has shown themselves to have no scruples and a willingness to do whatever they think is suitable to get the results they want. This came right on the heels of the GOP having a collective breakdown that Hunter wasn’t sufficiently punished or whatever in their mind. And unless I’m wrong, I don’t think Hunter ever did cocaine, so it’s an absolutely moronic but purposeful move by someone.

If it were a staffer, I’d like to think that person would be appropriately and confidentially dealt with and they would have said “the fingerprints were too smeared, we don’t know.” But they didn’t.

Hunter Biden is a hot mess. If he brought in a bag of coke and left it, his fingerprints and DNA would be all over it.

That’s how I know this isn’t Hunter’s coke.

No prints and no DNA? That’s a piece of conveniently planted evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is curious that no finger print could be found. I can understand no "matching" finger print, but not no finger print at all. That does seem fishy.

This is what I’m saying.

Full disclosure I’ve never done drugs, ever, not even weed, so I don’t know how people carry around their stash. I’ve seen plastic bags of it on TV dramas, but unless they put it in some sort of little box and handle it with gloves or tweezers, I fail to see how it just arrived there, fished out of someone’s pocket or purse, with no fingerprints and no DNA. What, did they wear gloves to remove the bag from their pocket? “Oh, just a minute, I need to put on gloves, for reasons.”

It’s very weird. The GOP has shown themselves to have no scruples and a willingness to do whatever they think is suitable to get the results they want. This came right on the heels of the GOP having a collective breakdown that Hunter wasn’t sufficiently punished or whatever in their mind. And unless I’m wrong, I don’t think Hunter ever did cocaine, so it’s an absolutely moronic but purposeful move by someone.

If it were a staffer, I’d like to think that person would be appropriately and confidentially dealt with and they would have said “the fingerprints were too smeared, we don’t know.” But they didn’t.

Hunter Biden is a hot mess. If he brought in a bag of coke and left it, his fingerprints and DNA would be all over it.

That’s how I know this isn’t Hunter’s coke.

No prints and no DNA? That’s a piece of conveniently planted evidence.

Can you tell us Sherlock why would they plant evidence in the high-traffic area? They clearly had access to other parts of the WH where the discovery of the bag with coke point to someone who needs to be discredited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thank goodness this stupid story is coming to a close. It was a Nothingburger from the beginning!

Of course, a drug addict president is nothing burger. considering the state of affairs in the entire US, this should be our least concern.